"WE NEVER TAUGHT IT!!!"
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
"WE NEVER TAUGHT IT!!!"
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
"WE NEVER TAUGHT IT!!!"
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
"WE NEVER TAUGHT IT!!!"
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
Before the Internet, I truly never realized there were people as DUMB AS YOU in the USA. I'm not kidding.
But if the NEA asserts that CRT is a much broader concept—encompassing anti-capitalism and anti-ableism—and a vital tool for fostering "honesty" in K-12 education, the organization is essentially validating conservative parents' concerns.
"WE NEVER TAUGHT IT!!!"
HORSE SHIT....NO ONE BELIEVES THAT TOTAL PACK OF LIES. CHANGING WHAT YOU CALL IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.
Before the Internet, I truly never realized there were people as DUMB AS YOU in the USA. I'm not kidding.
Before the Internet, I truly never realized there were people as DUMB AS YOU in the USA. I'm not kidding.
They CAN'T lie about teaching CRT. There's a ton of official education department documents from all over Virginia that explicity say they did. They actually say stuff like incorporating "Critical Race Theory" into the curriculum is one of the public school system's goals, etc.
The left in America today are the slipperiest, lying bastards I've ever seen in politics. The slipperiest, lying snake of them all is Barack Hussein Obama !
Dachshund
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
they use semantics to avoid the issue.......is true that CRT is not taught in elementary schools.......CRT is an educational method taught to prospective teachers in college.......but CRT is certainly USED in elementary schools......
from Yakuda's link above....
Critical Theory is not new.......it dates back to the 30s if not earlier........critical race theory, critical economics, critical sociology, critical theology........its applied everywhere........they begin by rejecting all scholarly conclusions established in a system of study.........then, they set a goal......"all whites are racists"........"capitalism is bad"........"climate change is man-made"........"Jesus is just a human and not an incarnate deity".......then they proceed to remove from the argument all facts, arguments, or doctrines which inconveniently interfere with their claims and replace them with idioms instead of fact.......
they use semantics to avoid the issue.......is true that CRT is not taught in elementary schools.......CRT is an educational method taught to prospective teachers in college.......but CRT is certainly USED in elementary schools......
from Yakuda's link above....
Critical Theory is not new.......it dates back to the 30s if not earlier........critical race theory, critical economics, critical sociology, critical theology........its applied everywhere........they begin by rejecting all scholarly conclusions established in a system of study.........then, they set a goal......"all whites are racists"........"capitalism is bad"........"climate change is man-made"........"Jesus is just a human and not an incarnate deity".......then they proceed to remove from the argument all facts, arguments, or doctrines which inconveniently interfere with their claims and replace them with idioms instead of fact.......
no......he may have been one of the first to apply critical theory to the subject of race, but critical theory itself dates back to Germany between 1920 and 1940.....NO, it doesn't. CRT was ORIGINALLY created ("from scratch") by a Black academic called Derek Bell at Harvard in the 1970's. Bell, now deceased, was one of Obama's idols - he even gave sycophantic speeches praising Bell's while he was one of Bell's students students on campus.
Today Derek Bell's work on CRT is rated as "shoddy scholarship" by most of the authoritative academics working in the social sciences.
Dachshund
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
The emergence of a new critical theory for the 21st century, exemplified in the writings of such theorists as Foucault, Agamben, Žižek, and Badiou as well as in such zones of contemporary discourse as biopolitics and globalization theory, has tremendous yet still uncharted consequences for theological thinking.
With the interest of all these late twentieth and early twenty-first century figures in religion and related theological issues, is it not perhaps time to name a genre that to date still remains unnamed – critical theology?
The name is starting to be used routinely and ad hoc in scattered cenacles, but no one has boldly sought yet to map the actual conceptual terrain of any new “critical theology.”
One of reasons perhaps is that the expression itself conjures up a cloud of untimely and misleading associations, such as the “crisis theology” of the interwar years 1920-40, which later morphed into what eventually became known as “neo-orthodoxy.”
no......he may have been one of the first to apply critical theory to the subject of race, but critical theory itself dates back to Germany between 1920 and 1940.....
https://politicaltheology.com/from-critical-theory-to-a-new-critical-theology/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theoryCritical theory is any approach to social philosophy that focuses on reflective assessment and critique of society and culture in order to reveal and challenge power structures. With roots in sociology and literary criticism, it argues that social problems stem more from social structures and cultural assumptions than from individuals. It argues that ideology is the principal obstacle to human liberation.[1] When critical theory was first introduced, it was considered a form of social science, but recently some have argued that it should fall under a different category.
Critical Theory (capitalized) also refers specifically to a school of thought practiced by the Frankfurt School theoreticians Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Erich Fromm, and Max Horkheimer. Horkheimer described a theory as critical insofar as it seeks "to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them."[2] Although a product of modernism, and although many of the progenitors of critical theory were skeptical of postmodernism, critical theory is one of the major components of both modern and postmodern thought, and is widely applied in the humanities and social sciences today (my note: including race).[3][4][5]
In addition to its roots in the first-generation Frankfurt School, critical theory has also been influenced by György Lukács and Antonio Gramsci. Additionally, second-generation Frankfurt School scholars have been influential, notably Jürgen Habermas. In Habermas's work, critical theory transcended its theoretical roots in German idealism and progressed closer to American pragmatism. Concern for social "base and superstructure" is one of the remaining Marxist philosophical concepts in much contemporary critical theory.[6]: 5–8
IRRELEVANT TO WHAT HAS BEEN TAUGHT TO OUR KIDS BY THESE MISCREANTS....