Freedom of the press didn't include high capacity printers!
- Thread starter Q-Tip
- Start date
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Nobody needs high capacity printers!
This is what they were talking about in "freedom of the press".
The first thing anyone does when they flip their lid is reach for their high-capacity printer! You can kill a lot of people with one of those things. Hand-cranked printers, not so much.
That doesn't matter!
It's not what our Founding Fathers were talking about when they came up with "freedom of the press".
The 2nd amendment is not about guns, it's about the right to bare them.
Nobody needs high capacity printers!
This is what they were talking about in "freedom of the press".
Deadlines have always been relevant to Press Releases, print or otherwise.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Back in the early 80's I worked in a small office in downtown Boston and there were a half-dozen or so guys my age, recent college grads, and a few were constantly playing practical jokes on others. Once, one of the guys found a picture of another and made dozens, maybe hundreds, copies of it, then taped them to traffic poles and the like all around the streets near our office. It was quite embarrassing for the poor kid, especially when strangers would
recognize him from the photo, point at him at laugh. If the kid wan't stable who knows what may have happened.
So yeah, high speed printers can be used to cause great harm.
Nobody needs high capacity printers!
This is what they were talking about in "freedom of the press".
What an incredibly stupid remark......
Just a picture, no caption?
It was meant to be stupid.
Just like snowflakes are claiming that the 2nd amendment only includes muzzleloaders.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
No caption.
countryboy
Verified User
But it's not stupid when morons like you make exactly the same argument with regards to the Second Amendment?
If you're going to argue what was in place when the 2nd amendment was written is what gun owners should be able to own, next time you want to exercise your freedom of speech, get off the internet, write me a letter using a quill pen, give it to a guy on a horse, and have him hand deliver it to me.
Think about that the next time one of you gun hating cunts says the 2nd amendment applies only to muskets.
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
They definitely didn't envision the internet. Why aren't liberals pounding the table about the founders intent on this issue?
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
A lot of disinformation and fake news can be disseminated.
Why are all of them on internet expressing their opinions as part of exercising their 1st amendment rights? Shouldn't they be writing letters with quill pens having a man on horseback deliver them to others?