Adversity Score

From the perspective of a functionally retarded racist, yes, I suppose that's how it looks. But, if you were capable of reading at at least a fifth-grade level, you'd see that this isn't about race at all. It's about economic background -- either individualized, by family, as I favor, or geographically, as they're apparently doing.

It may not address race on paper but it will in action. If you understood reality, you'd acknowledge the truth. Since 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks uses food stamps, you can bet your bottom dollar blacks will benefit from it far greater than they should.
 
I'd love a debate. Unfortunately, I'll have to wait until one of the more intelligent posters shows up. Until then, all we'll get is brain-dead "so you say" babbling, and your racist outbursts.

You want confirmation of your beliefs. That is evident in every post you make.

As a white male, I'm far more intelligent than a stupid fucking Liberal like you that thought a nigger was qualified to be President because of his skin color.
 
With some posters, I'm left wondering whether they're secretly allies of mine who are only posting in the guise of the crudest, stupidest caricatures of right-wing imbeciles and bigots in order to discredit the conservative movement.

why not factor in parent quality, domestic abuse, alcohol in the home. and does any of this make you more suited for higher education?
 
With some posters, I'm left wondering whether they're secretly allies of mine who are only posting in the guise of the crudest, stupidest caricatures of right-wing imbeciles and bigots in order to discredit the conservative movement.

I've wondered the same about you. I've been accused of creating characters not unlike you for that express purpose.
 
why not factor in parent quality, domestic abuse, alcohol in the home. and does any of this make you more suited for higher education?

It would be a good idea to factor those things in, if they could be meaningfully quantified. If someone had horrible parents and the handicap of a terrible home life, and yet still excelled academically, it suggests a great natural talent or extremely high personal discipline and character. But the problem is that's not as easy to quantify as parental earnings or local economic details. Instead, it winds up in the mushy part of the decision-making process that comes out of essays and interviews... the same way you'd factor in something like overcoming a serious childhood illness or disability.
 
I haven't "told" you how to post. I've asked courteously that you stop using a racial epithets. Please consider my request. Thanks.

You should already know the answer from previous discussions. If you keep asking, perhaps you're not as smart as you think.
 
You should already know the answer from previous discussions. If you keep asking, perhaps you're not as smart as you think.

I'm asking you politely to consider acceding to my request. If you don't, I'll ask again.
 
It would be a good idea to factor those things in, if they could be meaningfully quantified. If someone had horrible parents and the handicap of a terrible home life, and yet still excelled academically, it suggests a great natural talent or extremely high personal discipline and character. But the problem is that's not as easy to quantify as parental earnings or local economic details. Instead, it winds up in the mushy part of the decision-making process that comes out of essays and interviews... the same way you'd factor in something like overcoming a serious childhood illness or disability.

Perhaps you can explain how "overcoming a serious childhood illness or disability" is a defensible reason for being afforded an advantage by university admissions authorities.
 
Back
Top