Ok those on the left here is your chance.

[Concart]

Man, you are desperate.

The source you cited in your desperation says "Importantly, a disease’s R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. This means:

no one has been vaccinated
no one has had the disease before
there’s no way to control the spread of the disease"

Your source is also not peer-reviewed, as far as I can see. It makes assumptions unsupported by verifiable scientific evidence.

The lone study cited admits that the authors "collected an expanded set of case reports across China on the basis of publicly available information, estimated key epidemiologic parameters, and provided a new estimate of the early epidemic growth rate and R0 in Wuhan".

You fail.

Peer reviewed? ROTLFMAO!!! 2+2=4 does not require peer review.

 

[Earl]

No, no one told me this. No one told me that 2+2 = 4 either. I just know how to multiply.

Here, maybe this will help.

https://www.helpingwithmath.com/printables/tables_charts/3oa7multiplication_chart02.htm

Actually, 2 plus 2 is addition, not multiplication.

De nada.

 

[Concart]

I made a comfortable living as a machinist, doing math was the simple part of it. And you?

Okay, then here you go. If the infection rate is less than 1:1, the number of new cases will go down. True or False.

 

[Concart]

Actually, 2 plus 2 is addition, not multiplication.

De nada.

So, you can't add either. How sad, Earl.

 

[Irish]

If the economy can be brought to a grinding halt by a virus, and the only prescription is to reopen everything now without mass testing, then the fundamentals of the economy are not strong, never were, and the democratic socialists have been right this whole time.

Yeah because Cuban Venezuela and USSR all did/are doing great economically.

 

[Legion]

Peer reviewed? ROTLFMAO!!! 2=2=4 does not require peer review.

Math based on suspect data that is unverifiable is a mark of desperation. You are desperate.

 

[Concart]

Math based on suspect data that is unverifiable is a mark of desperation. You are desperate.

What data is suspect? One more time. If the infection rate is less than 1:1, the number of new cases will drop. True or False?

 

[Legion]

I want a source for the claims you made.

The one you cited in your desperation didn't pan out for you.

Cases go down when the number of people infected by each carrier drops below 1. That happens because of social distancing, contact tracing, and aggressive quarantine. Remove it, and that number is going to rise above 1.

 

[Concart]

I want a source for the claims you made.

The one you cited in your desperation didn't pan out for you.

If you are too stupid to do math, I can't help you any more.

 

[Legion]

What data is suspect?

The data that the source you cited used to arrive at their assumptions is suspect, as you've already been informed.

Cases go down when the number of people infected by each carrier drops below 1. That happens because of social distancing, contact tracing, and aggressive quarantine. Remove it, and that number is going to rise above 1.

 

[RB 60]

Actually, 2 plus 2 is addition, not multiplication.

De nada.

Actually, it's the only addition and multiplication problem (other than 1 + or x 1) that equals the same sum. So he's half right, even in spite of himself. I guess we can give him that

 

[Legion]

If you are too stupid to do math, I can't help you any more.

If you can't back up the claims you make, I'm not the one who needs help.

Cases go down when the number of people infected by each carrier drops below 1. That happens because of social distancing, contact tracing, and aggressive quarantine. Remove it, and that number is going to rise above 1.

 

[LV426]

Yeah because Cuban Venezuela and USSR all did/are doing great economically.

Those were totalitarian dictatorships, not social democracies.

The German, Danish, Norwegian, Swiss, Canadian, and South Korean economies are just fine.

 

[Concart]

Actually, it's the only addition and multiplication problem (other than 1 + or x 1) that equals the same sum. So he's half right, even in spite of himself. I guess we can give him that

I'm 100% right. Unfortunately, I'm discussing this with two braying jackasses. So I won't get far.

 

[Charoite]

If you are too stupid to do math, I can't help you any more.

Legion Troll argues just for shits and giggles. He has no real substance so don't waste your time.

 

[RB 60]

Okay, then here you go. If the infection rate is less than 1:1, the number of new cases will go down. True or False.

Nope. Not at all. A 1 to 1 ratio would not be good, that would be 50%/50%. Simple math, right?

 

[Earl]

So, you can't add either. How sad, Earl.

I can add...and multiply and I know the difference, Snowflake.

 

[RB 60]

Legion Troll argues just for shits and giggles. He has no real substance so don't waste your time.

Go away, fat ox.

 

[Earl]

Actually, it's the only addition and multiplication problem (other than 1 + or x 1) that equals the same sum. So he's half right, even in spite of himself. I guess we can give him that

Indeed.

His example was 2 plus 2.

Addition, not multiplication.

 

[Concart]

Nope. Not at all. A 1 to 1 ratio would not be good, that would be 50%/50%. Simple math, right?

Okay, since you are struggling with your reading skills as well, let's try again. If the infection rate IS LESS THAN 1:1 the number of new cases will go down. True or False?