Are smiling, well groomed Women and Seniors REALLY insurrectionists?

Are smiling, well groomed Women and Seniors REALLY insurrectionists?


s3-news-tmp-77017-itv_news--2x1--660.png


Please post pics and vids showing Women, Kids and well groomed, smiling Senior Citizen SUPPOSED "insurrectionists" at the Capitol.

Those men do not look well groomed. They do not seem healthy either. They are smiling, but so were the Nazis.
 
Those men do not look well groomed. They do not seem healthy either. They are smiling, but so were the Nazis.

You condemn them because they don't appeal to your "Queer Eye" standards.

And you violated Godwin's Law.

A term that originated on Usenet, Godwin's Law states that as an online argument grows longer and more heated, it becomes increasingly likely that somebody will bring up Adolf Hitler or the Nazis. When such an event occurs, the person guilty of invoking Godwin's Law has effectively forfieted the argument.
 
One guy looks poorly groomed but the rest seem fine. You said "those men" so which of the other look poorly groomed???

There are seven men's faces visible enough to see if they are well groomed. At least five of them are shaggy. If we could see the other two more close up, they might have stubble. They can be as ungroomed as they want, that is not the issue. There are plenty of ungroomed men who would never dream of breaking the Capitol Buildings windows, and there were some well groomed Nazis.

But the point is these are not a well groomed bunch of people. If they brought children, as Drummie claims, when storming the Capitol Building, they are very evil people.
 
Officer Sicknick was responding to the riots on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol and was injured while physically engaging with protesters. He returned to his division office and collapsed. He was taken to a local hospital where he succumbed to his injuries

https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/loss-uscp-colleague-brian-d-sicknick
But he collapsed on the 7th not on the 6th so they were lying by omission and he HAD NO INJURIES per the ME. So they were crafting a narrative that was not true. That is called lying. Now where did you come up with he was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher?
 
There are seven men's faces visible enough to see if they are well groomed. At least five of them are shaggy. If we could see the other two more close up, they might have stubble. They can be as ungroomed as they want, that is not the issue. There are plenty of ungroomed men who would never dream of breaking the Capitol Buildings windows, and there were some well groomed Nazis.

But the point is these are not a well groomed bunch of people. If they brought children, as Drummie claims, when storming the Capitol Building, they are very evil people.

Maybe Walt is lobbying to be the Fashion Police or the Grooming Police, (or maybe just a Local Nanny) in the new Nanny State Democrap Dick-tater-shit.
 
But he collapsed on the 7th not on the 6th so they were lying by omission and he HAD NO INJURIES per the ME. So they were crafting a narrative that was not true. That is called lying. Now where did you come up with he was bludgeoned with a fire extinguisher?

Number one, the Capitol Police press release stated that he died from injuries.
Number two, the fire extinguisher part came from two officials.

Those are two facts. You cannot blame the media for that.
 
There are seven men's faces visible enough to see if they are well groomed. At least five of them are shaggy. If we could see the other two more close up, they might have stubble. They can be as ungroomed as they want, that is not the issue. There are plenty of ungroomed men who would never dream of breaking the Capitol Buildings windows, and there were some well groomed Nazis.

But the point is these are not a well groomed bunch of people. If they brought children, as Drummie claims, when storming the Capitol Building, they are very evil people.
So Mr. GQ which ones EXACTLY do you think are ungroomed?? Be precise in your evaluation and description.
 
Number one, the Capitol Police press release stated that he died from injuries.
Number two, the fire extinguisher part came from two officials.

Those are two facts. You cannot blame the media for that.
1. Think critically . Why would they say he had injuries when clearly he did not and why would they say those fictitious injuries were caused by the insurrection when clearly that WAS NOT THE TRUTH. And why did they insinuate he had returned to the office on the 6th and died from his injuries caused by the riot when clearly that was not the truth either. Think critically APL . They are crafting a narrative that he was killed by rioters. His own mother said he died from a stroke BEFORE he lay in state in the rotunda for injuries he received in the Capital riot on 1/6. They wanted the country to think he was killed by rioters. He did not die in the line of duty like officer William Evans who was killed in the line of duty by a Farrakhan supporter and who did not lay in state in the rotunda.

2. Which two officials. Had they ever even seen Sicknick or were they gossiping or did they never even exist?
 
1. Think critically . Why would they say he had injuries when clearly he did not and why would they say those fictitious injuries were caused by the insurrection when clearly that WAS NOT THE TRUTH. And why did they insinuate he had returned to the office on the 6th and died from his injuries caused by the riot when clearly that was not the truth either. Think critically APL . They are crafting a narrative that he was killed by rioters. His own mother said he died from a stroke BEFORE he lay in state in the rotunda for injuries he received in the Capital riot on 1/6. They wanted the country to think he was killed by rioters. He did not die in the line of duty like officer William Evans who was killed in the line of duty by a Farrakhan supporter and who did not lay in state in the rotunda.

You have to ask the Capitol Police those questions. The media didn't "craft a narrative" about it.

2. Which two officials. Had they ever even seen Sicknick or were the

I do not know which ones.
 
1. Think critically . Why would they say he had injuries when clearly he did not and why would they say those fictitious injuries were caused by the insurrection when clearly that WAS NOT THE TRUTH. And why did they insinuate he had returned to the office on the 6th and died from his injuries caused by the riot when clearly that was not the truth either. Think critically APL . They are crafting a narrative that he was killed by rioters. His own mother said he died from a stroke BEFORE he lay in state in the rotunda for injuries he received in the Capital riot on 1/6. They wanted the country to think he was killed by rioters. He did not die in the line of duty like officer William Evans who was killed in the line of duty by a Farrakhan supporter and who did not lay in state in the rotunda.

2. Which two officials. Had they ever even seen Sicknick or were they gossiping or did they never even exist?

They are so used to lying and getting away with it, they clearly don't think there are ANY lies that they won't get away with.
 
Back
Top