A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.
I can't imagine why any sane person would object.
Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
I actually agree but I don't see how the R's and D's could possible agree on how it should be done.
There should be some sort of standardization for nationwide elections.
A good start is to get rid of mail in ballots and only count votes done at polls or absentee ballots that have been properly applied for.
Of course right there D's will call that "voter suppression".
A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.
I can't imagine why any sane person would object.
Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.
I can't imagine why any sane person would object.
Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
If absentee ballots are routinely approved as requested by all who might prefer to vote my mail, I personally wouldn't call that "voter suppression."
OK. As far as I know it's quite easy to register. Many don't want to be automatically registered because they just don't want to be registered. E.g., to avoid jury duty.Suppression of registrations must also be addressed, however.
Many don't want to be automatically registered because they just don't want to be registered. E.g., to avoid jury duty.We had no trouble finding all eighteen year old males back when we had a military draft,
so while I would have personally preferred 21, except maybe for under 21 members of the military,
getting everybody registered shouldn't be a problem either.
Many don't want to be automatically registered ... to avoid jury duty.
The voting rights act of 1965 made Jim Crow laws illegal by enforcing the 15th amendment but Scalia and Thomas ruled that the constitution prevented white christian males for staying in power.It's unconstitutional...
Yeah, because the Federal gov in the U.S. is so great at doing things.![]()
Just pulled the nation thru its first generational crisis since WWII, or did you think the private sphere got us to where we are now addressing Covid
A federal takeover of elections is not only a good idea, but an absolute imperative given the voter suppression efforts in the backwater red states.
I can't imagine why any sane person would object.
Frankly, I don't believe that many of them do.
Yeah, because the Federal gov in the U.S. is so great at doing things.![]()
Yeah, fuck the constitution.
Yeah, fuck the constitution.
The voting rights act of 1965 made Jim Crow laws illegal by enforcing the 15th amendment but Scalia and Thomas ruled that the constitution prevented white christian males for staying in power.
https://echocheck.org/fact-check-is-hr1-the-election-bill-constitutional/Is it Constitutional, Yes or No?: No, HR1 is not constitutional.
Degree of Certainty: 100%
https://www.cato.org/blog/hr-1-how-many-its-provisions-are-unconstitutionalHow many provisions of H.R. 1, if enacted, would be struck down by the courts as unconstitutional? It’s not clear anyone has tried to compile a full list, but the likely answer is, “quite a few.”
HR-1 is a dirty trick that allows donors to give 1000 X more than they do now. I'm talking about the the 15th amendment which states “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, or by any State, on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”The constitution leaves how elections are handled up to the states.
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-i/clauses/750
https://echocheck.org/fact-check-is-hr1-the-election-bill-constitutional/
https://www.cato.org/blog/hr-1-how-many-its-provisions-are-unconstitutional
Unless you want to take The Daily Kos' word for it based on their research using Wikipedia...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/4/1/2024021/-HR-1-Constitutionality
HR-1 is a dirty trick that allows donors to give 1000 X more than they do now. I'm talking about the the 15th amendment which states “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, or by any State, on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”
You got a vegetable garden started?If we had a functioning SCOTUS it would be illegal.
We dont.
You got a vegetable garden started?