7-2 transgender student wins!

This was a conservative opinion. It established no precedent about transgender rights that apply to any other court decisions and did not interfere with the decisions of schools on these issues.

So you are saying that Jarod the lawyer was misinterpreting law? I find that shocking.
 
Which bathroom should this freak use?

I4yJDsr.jpg

Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".
 
Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".

It's a question of cost and size.
 
It's a question of cost and size.

Not really. Building a large room full of multiple toilets and sinks or building multiple smaller rooms with toilets and sinks are not that much of a cost difference, trust me, I studied architecture in college, it really doesn't cost all that much more to just add smaller, more private, restrooms and you can even cluster them, kind of like stalls, but better. They are slightly more expensive, but far more comfortable for women in particular.
 
Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".

it would be much more expensive given the cost per square foot of construction.....
 
it would be much more expensive given the cost per square foot of construction.....

Not nearly as much as you think, it is a design thing rather than an expense thing. "We've always done it" seems to be the norm as to the why. However, nowadays you will see the newer buildings are doing exactly as I noted and often they are building smaller and more private restrooms, instead of two they have like 4, sometimes also adding a "family" restroom which allows folks to utilize it without worrying about gender assignments.

Personally, comfort of customers would be worth the added cost, and it would avoid the controversy altogether.
 
In a 7-2 decision Alito and Thomas were the only ones who disagreed, the Supreme Court agreed to let stand a decision allowing students to chose the bathroom they most identified with!

Trump appointments Kavanaugh, Goresuch and Barrett agreed.

I guess Trump was ineffective at making the Court more conservative.
Then why were little bitches like yourself whining so hard?
 
Not really. Building a large room full of multiple toilets and sinks or building multiple smaller rooms with toilets and sinks are not that much of a cost difference, trust me, I studied architecture in college, it really doesn't cost all that much more to just add smaller, more private, restrooms and you can even cluster them, kind of like stalls, but better. They are slightly more expensive, but far more comfortable for women in particular.

you are definitely wrong.......men's public restrooms typically have one entrance, a half dozen urinals, four stalls and three sinks.......you would have to replace that with six entrances, six toilets and six sinks; on top of that it would require more square footage and considerably more complicated plumbing........and, since only six people could use them at a time you would slow down the process.....
 
Why do we gender bathrooms anyway? It would be so much simpler to make multiple smaller public restrooms that we don't have to share with anyone and then you wouldn't have to call somebody living their best life a "freak".
Duh!! Because women get bent out of shape if the seat is left up.
 
Not nearly as much as you think, it is a design thing rather than an expense thing. "We've always done it" seems to be the norm as to the why. However, nowadays you will see the newer buildings are doing exactly as I noted and often they are building smaller and more private restrooms, instead of two they have like 4, sometimes also adding a "family" restroom which allows folks to utilize it without worrying about gender assignments.

Personally, comfort of customers would be worth the added cost, and it would avoid the controversy altogether.

have you forgotten what the bathrooms in high schools were like in that ten minute break between algebra and English lit?......
 
Might as well, since nothing keeps anyone from using whatever bathroom they wanted in the first place. Not really something you could enforce even if it was unanimous against it.

Public schools can do that, which is what I think was underlying this case. Although the plaintiff presented as a boy, the school administration wanted him to use the girls' room. As a female person, I don't think I would have much liked that when I was a kid.
 
I almost never used the public restroom when I was in High School. That was a nasty place, best to be avoided at all costs.

Ours weren't bad, but the minutes after the late bell rang, there was a bit of a haze in them...
 
you are definitely wrong.......men's public restrooms typically have one entrance, a half dozen urinals, four stalls and three sinks.......you would have to replace that with six entrances, six toilets and six sinks; on top of that it would require more square footage and considerably more complicated plumbing........and, since only six people could use them at a time you would slow down the process.....

You again pretend I said it would cost nothing more. I didn't say that, I said it would cost more but less so than you are trying to infer.

During construction, adding some pipe to the wall I have already designed for the public restrooms is not difficult, and would not complicate much for the plumbers. This only becomes exceedingly expensive if you were to update an already existing facility. So, plumbing, one of your "objections" just isn't that much more.

Adding entrances, again, not that danged expensive during construction, you design a place to put the door, the door goes in there. It is again only exceedingly expensive if you were to try to update a current structure. Then you assume that one couldn't make these about the size of a stall (most that I have seen easily could fit inside some of the larger stalls in a restroom). All you need is one toilet and one sink and enough room to wipe and wash your hands.

Basically, think of that wall full of stalls in your basic female restroom, think of it expanded a foot or so back having an entrance, a lock, and a small sink inside... While this would be more expensive than building two echo chambers full of strangers, it would not be massively more expensive if you design this space beforehand. The square footage actually becomes smaller in this use as you don't have the huge spaces that folks walk through to get past the sinks and urinals to the stall so they can stink up the room for you....

A well designed space would be minimally more expensive than huge echo filled spaces that are often less than fully utilized and actually gain you more customers because the comfort level increases. You no longer have to share the space with strangers, and you no longer have the issue of small children sharing the space with somebody you consider strange, or the wrong sex, etc.
 
In a 7-2 decision Alito and Thomas were the only ones who disagreed, the Supreme Court agreed to let stand a decision allowing students to chose the bathroom they most identified with!

Trump appointments Kavanaugh, Goresuch and Barrett agreed.

I guess Trump was ineffective at making the Court more conservative.

If you are a man, and go into any bathroom labeled female with my daughter, granddaughter, wife, mother, or any other family member of the female persuasion is in your identity will be the least of your worries! Friggin psychopaths Penis = Boy Vagina = girl
 
Back
Top