Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY!

I thought that in America the Constitution is the ULTIMATE LAW ?

The Constitution says you have the right to BEAR (CARRY) arms. Right?

So Kyle Rittenhouse was just exercising his Second Amendment right by carrying his rifle. He wasn't threatening anyone with it in a reckless, dangerous, etc; manner, the video/drone footage prooves that. So there's was no issue here ?


Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
No I don’t think the plaintiff would have to show that. Florida, and I believe Wisconsin, our contributory negligence states.

and all rittenhouse would have to do is show the videos of rosenbaum, huber, and grosskreutz trying to kill him......it all goes away. then I think that rittenhouse should countersue for the emotional trauma he suffered because they forced him to defend himself
 
Your articles do not show anything MSM said that was a lie about Rittenhouse.

From the cited articles:

Rittenhouse took an AR-15 across state lines. Esquire accused him of “terrorist tourism.” False. His rifle was kept in a safe at his best friend’s stepfather’s house in Kenosha.

That is an outright lie by the magazine Esquire.

He was an “active shooter” who took his gun to a riot looking for trouble. “A 17-year-old kid just running around shooting and killing protesters,” said MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, “who drove across state lines with an AR-15 and started shooting people up.”

Another outright lie by a talking head on TV. If any network is ass fucked for libel and slander it's MSNBC led buy that insane bigot, racist Joy Reid. I could see her being fired over this just because of the cost of settling with Rittenhouse for the shit they've said about him.

It's no different than the Covington settlement

Washington Post settles $250M suit with Covington teen Nick Sandmann
https://nypost.com/2020/07/24/washi...ettle,victory in a tweet on his 18th birthday.

This is 99% sure to cost networks like CNN and MSNBC many millions in settlement to get out from under the lies and shit they've slung at Rittenhouse.
 
The problem is, these decedents were slimebags with whole families of slimebags that don't give a fuck if it was justified or not. All they know is that someone they unconditionally loved is not going to fill an empty chair this holiday season where they had for seasons and seasons before. That, and the guy that killed them is having celebration pizza.

They won't care. They won't give a single fk that it was justified. Especially the females.

Already read through a few death threats right here on these boards.

Better not to live in a shthole like Illinois anyway. Move kiddo. Move quick. But remember, pederast heroin cartel junky faggots are everywhere now. Skip the catholic places.
 
so you think that it's ok for people/families to sue someone because they shot their kid for trying to kill them?

It's certainly a plaintiff's right to try.

The question is, what does an 18 year old kid have to satisfy a judgement with?

Unless he gets rich by writing a book or selling movie rights, he's got no assets to pursue.
 
It wasn't advisable for anybody to be at the riot. Personally I tend to avoid trouble.

So the people who owned businesses and property there should have just let the violent thugs burn them down as they had the night before?

Again, this is the result of city government not meeting their most important duty, to protect life and property. If cities ignore that duty, then law abiding citizens of the absolute right to defend with any means at their disposal.
 
Are you being obtuse? Joy Reid compared Kyle Rittenhouse’s ‘male white tears’ to Brett Kavanaugh’s. They claimed he killed two black BLM protesters. They claimed Rittenhouse took an AR-15 across state lines. They claimed the gun was illegal. They claimed Rittenhouse is a “white supremacist,” who took his gun to a riot looking for trouble.

There's much more if you need it. Hell, we can post the videos too.
:palm:


Do you understand what defamation is? Comparing his tears to something is not defamation... Silly.
 
Do you understand what defamation is? Comparing his tears to something is not defamation... Silly.

Did they claim he killed two black BLM protesters? Did they claim Rittenhouse took an AR-15 across state lines? Did they claim Rittenhouse is a “white supremacist,” who took his gun to a riot looking for trouble?
 
So the people who owned businesses and property there should have just let the violent thugs burn them down as they had the night before?
if I was a property owner you can bet I'd protect my property against rioters with a heavy arsenal to include rocket propelled grenade launchers, mortars and 30mm Gatling guns in addition to small arms.
Hope that answers your question.
Again, this is the result of city government not meeting their most important duty, to protect life and property. If cities ignore that duty, then law abiding citizens of the absolute right to defend with any means at their disposal.
You are right. Except in Portland. But that's a different story.
 
and all rittenhouse would have to do is show the videos of rosenbaum, huber, and grosskreutz trying to kill him......it all goes away. then I think that rittenhouse should countersue for the emotional trauma he suffered because they forced him to defend himself

You might be correct, I cant predict what a jury would do.
 
From the cited articles:



That is an outright lie by the magazine Esquire.



Another outright lie by a talking head on TV. If any network is ass fucked for libel and slander it's MSNBC led buy that insane bigot, racist Joy Reid. I could see her being fired over this just because of the cost of settling with Rittenhouse for the shit they've said about him.

It's no different than the Covington settlement


https://nypost.com/2020/07/24/washi...ettle,victory in a tweet on his 18th birthday.

This is 99% sure to cost networks like CNN and MSNBC many millions in settlement to get out from under the lies and shit they've slung at Rittenhouse.

Esquire is not MSM. He was an "active shooter", Its a matter of opinion if he was "looking for trouble", he was "running around killing protestors", he did "Drive across state lines", he had an AR-15 and did start shooting people.... All of those statements are TRUE.

You have no idea if Washington Post paid a dime, and you know it, your own article even says so. Read past the misleading headline.
 
Esquire is not MSM. He was an "active shooter", Its a matter of opinion if he was "looking for trouble", he was "running around killing protestors", he did "Drive across state lines", he had an AR-15 and did start shooting people.... All of those statements are TRUE.

That's a lie. ALL of those statements are FALSE or out of context. :palm:
 
Do you understand what defamation is? Comparing his tears to something is not defamation... Silly.

She was claiming he is a white supremacist. I see that you ignored all the other MSM lies and appear to try to deflect from all their obvious lies. :palm:
 
Lol, what a dirtbag.

Hey giant head!!! How's the neck holding up lol. I say this in a completely objective matter. We are not a civilized country any longer. Anyone who believes otherwise is not paying attention. The only thing the enemies of this country understand is a punch in the face. I hope that starts tonight. I hope a BUNCH of people show up with AR-15s and the shooting starts. Because until that happens, those who want to destroy the country will have free rein to do whatever they want. I think it's time to put a stop to that. Pretty simple stuff.
 
Back
Top