Thomas was always identified as a conservative. Even the appearance of impropriety tarnishes SCOTUS....which, since 2016, have become extremely tarnished.
If you remember the Bill Clinton Lincoln bedroom scandal and the Clinton Foundation scandal where large donations gave an appearance of impropriety and buying access, then you should agree that the actions of Thomas are no different.
Thomas is on the Supremes. That makes it all different. It is the highest court in the land and is supposed to decide neutrally according to law. Crow has been buying Thomas for over 20 years. This is much worse than a Lincoln bedroom event.
A black man can't enjoy some of the finer things in America? Good to see he visited the Bohemian Grove.
democrats hate successful blacks. Guno is just jealous he cannot even be a poor black person. Pimply, broke ass white boy he is.
...and you hate all blacks. Which is better, Sailor?
How do you know guno is white, male and broke? Projection? Dick pics in PM?
Obviously you do not know me at all. You poor dumb bastard. democrat of course.
I've read your posts, Sailor. What more do I need to know?
Why did you run like a cowardly chickenshit when asked about your knowledge of guno?
Wrong again, dumbass. Libertarian, not a Democrat, and I've never voted Democrat. Although I've mellowed with age, I used to be very Right Wing, American-style, not today's fascist one country, one party, one leader bullshit you are pushing.
![]()
^^^Wow. Old Doc is feeling his oats today. Geritol kicking in Gramps? Because in real life you would just stand there and piss yourself. As I am sure you always have.
^^^
Still runs from the question about guno. Is the reason because he's a liar and knows it?
![]()
Guno. Absolutely. That is why he can only post stupid GIF's like you do. And never answer directly to the questions. Hmmmm...
^^^
Still runs from the question about guno. Is the reason because he's a liar and knows it?
![]()
Thomas is on the Supremes. That makes it all different. It is the highest court in the land and is supposed to decide neutrally according to law. Crow has been buying Thomas for over 20 years. This is much worse than a Lincoln bedroom event.
He is a bitter old drunk who follows me around, he is not interest in discussion
I'm always curious about people who claim to be veterans then spend most of their time screaming "stolen valor" against others.
Like Matt Dillon, Sailor does seem to have severe anger issues. A wellness check might do him some good.
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?
You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
he has always been a far rightys, but he and his wife have gone to a level never seen on the court or around it. They are conspiracy nuts that would be fine of this board. Like all the rightys, they claimed they would be fair and call balls and stril\kes as fairly as possible. He lied. Kavanaugh lied. Barrett died. They had a far right agenda to impose on the country. Biden should have expanded the court.
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?
You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.
It is true Thomas has never had respect for the Constitution. He has always wanted his right-wing beliefs to be law. However, he has Crow whispering into his ear again and again. he is getting pushed constantly. Thomas never expressed his conspiratorial beliefs in the past. Now he wants them to be law.
I was happier when judges were not so proudly out of the mainstream. and against the constitution.
Is ruling neutrally code for its neutral when you agree and not a neutral ruling when you disagree?
You still haven’t shown how Thomas supposedly changed his judicial philosophy on the bench from his first ten years until after Crow supposedly “bought” him. I can answer why, because Thomas hasn’t changed. His judicial philosophy has been the same since he joined the court. You just don’t like it.