Not sure what interpretation of history you're referring too but I would be interested to know more.
Ketanji Brown defines what stupid and DEI look like in comments made regarding the imaginary fabricated claim of birthright citizenship.
- Thread starter Truth Detector
- Start date
Wrong again little dopey brainless man. There wasn't even such a thing as limited immigration or green cards at the time.
Again, in order to be born a citizen, it is clearly stated in the 14th amendment one must be a citizen or a LEGAL resident for their children to enjoy the benefit of citizenship. Much like nearly every nation on the planet.
Wrong again dopey little brainless man; it is based on LEGAL immigration. DUH!
There are temporary work visas that give them a legal right to work in this country. Not birth children under the false pretense of birthRIGHT citizenship. There is no such thing no matter how much you flail, lie or deflect.
BY the way, economic immigration is not an accepted claim for asylum either.
How is the actual content of the 14th amendment absurd, you brainless little halfwit? The only one flailing, lying and deflecting here is you brainless little halfwit.
As I stated, there is no "birthright citizenshgip" contained in the Constitution any more than the equally specious claim of a "separation clause."
Now I know facts cause you to become unhinged and prone to engage in asinine bullshit, but those are the facts brainless little halfwit.
Cry harder, you whiny little brainless halfwit.
Wrong again brainless little halfwit. That statement is laughably ignorant and if you had even half a brain, you would be embarrassed by it.
There is no "birthright citizenship" within the Constitution. It is clearly a privilege given to Citizens and those who are LEGAL residents.
President Lincoln in his SOTU Address to Congress on December 8, 1863:
“I again submit to your consideration the expediency of establishing a system for the encouragement of immigration. All though this source of national wealth and strength is again flowing with greater freedom than for several years before the insurrection occurred, there is still a great deficiency of laborers in every field of industry, especially in agriculture, and in our mines, as well as of iron and coal as of the precious metals. While the demand for labor is thus increased here, tens of thousands of persons, destitute of remunerative occupation, are thronging our foreign consulates and offering to emigrate to the United States if essential, but very cheap assistance, can be afforded them.”
Which resulted in the Act to Encourage Immigration (https://www.lincolncottage.org/lincolns-forgotten-act-to-encourage-immigration/)
Because it is moronic to claim somethings aren’t relevant because they are not specifically written in the Constitution but other things are even though they are also not directly in the wording of the ConstitutionHow is the actual content of the 14th amendment absurd, you brainless little halfwit? The only one flailing, lying and deflecting here is you brainless little halfwit.
As I stated, there is no "birthright citizenshgip" contained in the Constitution any more than the equally specious claim of a "separation clause."
Now I know facts cause you to become unhinged and prone to engage in asinine bullshit, but those are the facts brainless little halfwit.
Cry harder, you whiny little brainless halfwit.
And the end of your post was as predicted
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Poor Low grade
Ah, now we got the full “you are ………” and “a …………,” just as predicted, only the corny GIF is missing
Never said there was, but it is covered under the Constitution just as a jury of one’s peers and privacy are, you are just repeating your invalidated “argument”
Why is "all persons born" difficult to understand?
Ok where does he mention BR citizenship?
Allowing third world welfare wards and then allowing their kids to be citizens just for being born while the parents are mooching is where we seem to diverge.
Again we all seem to agree that orderly immigration is good but the question is BR citizenship. Although distantly related it's an entirely different question.
Why are those three words not being the question difficult to understand?
Those three words cannot be rid of.
The very next word is "And" which is where your ability to reason appears to break down.
Ok lefty here's your chance. Explain why BR citizenship is beneficial to America and Americans? Explain why it would be a good policy to keep in place indefinitely in today's world? Use small words so I can understand ok?
Because someone said so in 1868 is not an answer.
Contributions to the economy, for example
If they had no official citizenship requirement or process prior to Lincoln wouldn’t anyone living in the US at the time be either a birthright citizen or descendant of a birthright citizen? In fact, you most likely are a descendant a birthright citizen.
At one time European immigrants from Ireland, Eastern, and Southern Europe, from which the majority of caucasian Americans today trace their roots, were also from improvised poor nations
And birthright citizen was never a serious issue thru all the waves of immigration America experienced
Until? I think your mind is headed in the right direction now.
Think about why it became an issue and you will understand the fuss.
Here is a hint from Ai.
"U.S. immigration law began with the Naturalization Act of 1790, which established the first rules for U.S. citizenship. While the 18th and early 19th centuries had relatively open borders, federal restriction and regulation increased significantly in the late 1800s, starting with the Page Act of 1875 and the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882"
It was when people started gaming the system.
You're describing immigration in general, not the ability to be a citizen by being born here by whomever. These people could contribute just as much with a green card and as a permanent resident. It's the illegal immigration by the parents that's really the issue now isn't it? Are you in favor of unchecked immigration? Can our country sustain half of the third world?
Truth is you are in favor of hating DJT and that's about as far as you've given it any thought. You and most of the rest here.
Again, I don't hate Trump.
Some reading comprehension would do you good little halfwit. What part of LEGAL immigration are you struggling to comprehend halfwit?
What is MORONIC are your desperate attempts to avoid the obvious, fabricate boorish bullshit while flailing and deflecting.
The Constitution says what it says. No amount of hand wringing, flailing or lying can change that.
Try to comprehend what LEGAL immigration means if that tiny low IQ brain of yours can even comprehend that.
Your crying and flailing are boring halfwit.