Indeed...it's pretty fascinating, though, isn't it? I'd love to hear the JPP's resident shrink's take on the affliction sometime
(Perhaps he'd be willing to help....the line of communication is already open there, after all...
Indeed...it's pretty fascinating, though, isn't it? I'd love to hear the JPP's resident shrink's take on the affliction sometime
Barr is one impressive SOB....we need a lot more like him.
HA HA HAThe left who? The Democrats are not creating any violence nor do we condone violence.
If someone destroys a federal building or any building, they should be held accountable and punished.
“Can’t we just say the violence against the federal courts has to stop? Could we hear something like that?”
The room was silent. The attorney general challenged their loyalty, and not a single Democrat objected.
Why? He was impressive as was Bill Barr. Who was the mouthy black woman who tried to stop him speaking, odious creature?
I think the exact opposite of what you think. Barr's become a tool of trump as was evident, and Jordan's nothing but a bloviating, self-important hack who never says anything of substance.
I think the exact opposite of what you think. Barr's become a tool of trump as was evident, and Jordan's nothing but a bloviating, self-important hack who never says anything of substance.
Jordan is a buffoon. Not even substantial enough to worry about.
He selectively edited that video the hearing opened with. And it makes me sick that he's not cooperating with the investigation into the OSU sexual abuse scandal when he knew the team doctor very well. It reminds me of all those who claimed they knew nothing about Jerry Sandusky's years of pedophilia at PSU.
Barr disagreed with commuting Stone - i have no idea how you can claim he's not independentI think the exact opposite of what you think. Barr's become a tool of trump as was evident, and Jordan's nothing but a bloviating, self-important hack who never says anything of substance.
Barr disagreed with commuting Stone - i have no idea how you can claim he's not independent
I think you are looking to see partisanship instead of an independent DoJBecause of the totality of the hearing, not just one incident.