According to experts, Annals by the Roman historian Tacitus was published between 105 and 116 AD.
That's not "more than 100 Years" after the execution of Jesus, which is what you claimed.
That's only 75 to 85 years after the execution of Jesus. That's about the same amount of time between now and World War 2. People still write histories of World War 2 today.
In 105 AD Tacitus would have access to Roman records and information that we don't have because they no longer exist.
So in summarizing your two massive mistakes:
1) You claimed Jesus of Nazareth was never recorded in any history book. WRONG. The Roman historian Tacitus wrote about the execution of Jesus by Pontuis Pilate in his history of the Roman Empire published about 80 years after the crucifixion.2) You tried to backpedal and claims Tacitus' histories was published "more than 100 years" after the crucifixion. WRONG. Tacitus' history of the Roman Empire was published between 105 and 116 AD. That's about 75-80 years after the trial of Jesus under Pontius Pilate. A 75- 80 year time gap is completely normal for a work of history. People are still writing histories about the Eisenhower presidency or World War 2.
