If you’re too clueless to know the parties did “switch” I feel for your son.
Irony abounds.
If you’re too clueless to know the parties did “switch” I feel for your son.
It wasn't a big deal to me! I just wanted to remind Racetard that he already has committed the new sin!

The one that's named after Butch Uncle.![]()
Come on Legion! You know no one can edit people's quotes better than you! You are the King your majesty! Be proud!
We'll call this new rule the Dutch Uncle rule.
Quote Box Altering: One can alter a quote box by removing some of a wall of text to expose the specific part you are responding to, or splitting it apart so you can respond to each item one at a time. However, altering the words posted and changing the meaning of what they said for whatever reason (a joke for instance) is not allowed unless you change the "quoted by" portion of the quote to make it clear that the original poster did not post what you are "making" them say. We will begin by deleting these posts, and if it continues we will get into banning.
I do it the right way. Butch Uncle did not.
Damo called it that because it was Dutch who complained the most about people editing his comments. THE SQUEAKIEST WHEELS GET THE GREASE
English teacher?
Is that so? Who told you that?
You spend 12 - 16 hours here a day and you didn't know this?
Answer the question. Who supposedly told you that "Damo called it that because it was Dutch who complained the most about people editing his comments?
BTW, maybe you don't know what "legion" means. That'd be understandable if your parents disliked you enough to force you into a government school staffed with with unionized babysitters just to get you out of the house for a few hours.
Damo told us all by naming the new rule after Dutch!
Legion was a TV series about a super Mutant!
Is that your final answer? Damo said he called it that because it was Dutch who complained the most about people editing his comments by naming the new rule after Dutch?
It looks like I was right. Your parents disliked you enough to force you into a government school staffed with with unionized babysitters just to get you out of the house for a few hours. Poor thing.
If you’re too clueless to know the parties did “switch” I feel for your son.
Of course you have no real argument to support that. Yet I do.
First, parents tend to instill their values onto their kids. Sure there are rebellious teens and all but that typically goes away with maturity. For example in my household my grandparents were libertarian Republicans, as were my parents, as am I, and now my adult children. It's ludicrous to assert that an entire party switched its core values overnight. Then have the opposition switch its opposing values at the same time? Beyond ludicrous.
Next, look at the laws that were passed themselves. Supported by Republicans, and opposed by Democrats- some vehemently. It's most vocal opponent was later hyped to be "the conscience of the senate". Fucking laughable.
Next, note that the law passed in 1964 was nearly identical language that was written by Republicans, and opposed by Democrats, one hundred years prior.
Then there's the fact that Democrats still believe that the rich make money off the backs of the poor. Same as when they were actual slavers.
So the "Big Switch" is obviously just a lie. A very convenient one.
Since the simplest explanation is often the truth, here's one: Democrats came to the realization that putting physical chains on the black man wasn't working out for them, so they changed tactics. LBJ's strategy worked much better. Since then, the percentage of young blacks growing up fatherless has skyrocketed.
How's this for a real argument:
"The Solid South or Southern bloc was the electoral voting bloc of the states of the Southern United States for issues that were regarded as particularly important to the interests of Democrats in those states. The Southern bloc existed especially between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. During this period, the Democratic Party controlled state legislatures; most local and state officeholders in the South were Democrats, as were federal politicians elected from these states. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Southern Democrats disenfranchised blacks in all Southern states, along with a few non-Southern states doing the same as well. This resulted essentially in a one-party system, in which a candidate's victory in Democratic primary elections was tantamount to election to the office itself. White primaries were another means that the Democrats used to consolidate their political power, excluding blacks from voting in primaries.[1]" Wikipedia.
Consider your own comment quoted in boldface. That doesn't suggest a "switch" to you?
Today, the South is as solid for Republicans as it once was for Democrats.
