Infuriated

[Micawber]

Can you site an actual source for your claims. Im sorry but I just don't trust what any leftist writes or says about anything.

"Fuck you, that's why, snowflake"

 

[Micawber]

It astounds me because Republicans use to paint themselves as the standard bearer of morality, decency and the Constitutional Way, not anymore.

It is the party of old, hateful white country people. That's why the shit that comes out of Trump's foul mouth sounds so good to them. The "fuck you" party. Nothing more than that.

 

[Yakuda]

"Fuck you, that's why, snowflake"

You are sounding like the snowflake Skippy I just want to see supporting eveidence for claims that are being made. If you dobt have any just say a,land admit you're a snivelling little pussy.

 

[Micawber]

Translation: Supreme Court appointments is all I have to support my lack of values when it is so obvious in 1000 ways I voted for a criminal immoral scoundrel clown traitor.. .

Guess what, any other Republican candidate would have appointed conservative justices. That leaves Trump with NOTHING to recommend himself.
Your party is a bunch of old culture warring traitors. EVERY SINGLE TRUMP VOTE is treason and an attack on the USA you and I grew up loving.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

This muck raking propagandist asked a trap question like the famous, "When did you stop beating your wife?".

The President tried to answer it and wandered around finally arriving at the obvious conclusion: There will be no transfer of power because he's going to win.

Of course, the Democrat-Socialist campaign workers wearing their BLM shirts may fire bomb several polling places since they are in churches, so there's that.

What was Biden's response to this same question when he was asked? Hint: He wasn't asked.

That aside though, you have to wonder why Biden has 600 lawyers on payroll to challenge election results if he plans to accept everything the voters produce with no question.

Regarding the "old fashioned way", wouldn't that be voting in person at the polls on election day?

Crazy post by crazy poster is crazy. That's the only reply needed to this pure Fox propaganda.

 

[Ichabod Stain]

Your so-called President publicly announced that ballots need to be disregarded in the upcoming election, his intent to add a Conservative judge before the election and to have the election put in the hands of the court. The same ballots that he uses. That most of Congress uses. That have been used without controversy for generations. And then made the comment "Four more years! And then four more after that...."

The nominee he wants to put up doesn't think women should be allowed to vote. Believes that each household should only have 1 vote and that be submitted by the male head of household. Wants to overturn gay rights and women's rights. Women not allowed to vote but a woman can be on the Supreme court...

sorry your voter fraud is being thwarted. not.

 

[LV426]

They all do. Im still waiting for proof trump killed people with covid. I think I'll be collecting retirement before that happens.

Trump lied about the threat of COVID, calling it "the sniffles" to his brain-dead supporters like you, who repeated that lie, while telling Woodward in private that it's very deadly and passed through the air.

So that's how he killed 200,000+ people and counting, and why you bear personal responsibility for this pandemic as well.

 

[Jarod]

Well, Hillary has advised Dementia Joe not to concede...”under ANY circumstances.”

Hillary told Biden is not the same as Trump saying it himself, is it?

 

[WalterWilson]

Can you site an actual source for your claims. Im sorry but I just don't trust what any leftist writes or says about anything.

https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...e-electors-plan-loyalists-swing-states-2020-9

The Trump campaign is weighing a postelection strategy that would bypass the results in key swing states by installing electors who would vote for the president in the Electoral College even if he loses, The Atlantic reported.

Using a rationale of baseless claims about widespread voter fraud and other irregularities with mail ballots, President Donald Trump "would ask state legislators to set aside the popular vote and exercise their power to choose a slate of electors directly," The Atlantic's Barton Gellman wrote, adding that "the longer Trump succeeds in keeping the vote count in doubt, the more pressure legislators will feel to act before the safe-harbor deadline expires."

Experts have said that moves by state legislatures to appoint their own slate of presidential electors after the election would violate federal law, because Congress enacted a statute in 1845 requiring states to appoint their electors to the Electoral College on Election Day.

Many states have expanded access to voting by mail and, either legislatively or pursuant to court orders, extended deadlines by which ballots can be received — moves that could reduce the number of disenfranchised voters.

In previous years, enough of the vote has been counted by Election Day for networks and newspapers to announce a winner. Importantly, the results of any election are never finalized on election night; in most places, it takes officials days or weeks to fully canvass and then certify the results.

But as more Americans this year are expected to cast mail ballots, which take longer to process and count than in-person votes, it's very likely that there won't be enough ballots counted to declare a winner on election night.

During the canvassing process, canvassing boards — which are usually composed of county-level election officials — process and tabulate not just the ballots of people who voted in person, but absentee and mail-in ballots, provisional ballots, and ballots from overseas and military voters.

With the key swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin unable to legally process or count absentee ballots until Election Day, and with ongoing legal disputes over ballots received after Election Day, the Trump campaign is reportedly looking to cast doubt on the results and extend the battle to Inauguration Day.

The Trump campaign's plan would focus on pivotal swing states with Republican-led legislatures, including Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Arizona and Florida also have Republican governors, while the latter states have Democratic governors.
How would this plan work, and how might it backfire?

While Americans have a right to one vote, there is no constitutional right to vote for the president, and Americans don't directly elect the president. Each state appoints a certain number of electors that corresponds to its number of US House representatives and senators.

The Electoral College was conceived at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a compromise between those who wanted Americans to elect presidents directly and those who wanted Congress to have the deciding vote.

Under Article II of the Constitution, state legislatures have the authority to appoint their states' electors in a manner they determine — which legislatures could cite as a justification for directly appointing loyal Trump electors.

But an effort by a legislature to go rogue and override the results of the popular vote in the state could backfire and be more trouble than it's worth.

As the National Task Force on Election Crises explained in a recent legal memo, federal law doesn't require state legislatures to hold popular elections, but it does require states to appoint their slate of electors on Election Day, or the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

State legislatures that attempt to appoint their own slate of Trump electors after the election would likely spur court challenges and risk having Congress decide how the state can allocate its electoral votes.

The "safe harbor" deadline, by which states must certify their results without risking congressional involvement, falls on December 8 this year. Six days later, the electors convene to vote.

The task force's memo noted that "the consequences of failing to adhere" to the safe-harbor requirements established by federal law "are significant."

"Losing the safe harbor protection leaves Congress to decide which electors to count from a state, without mandatory deference to the preferences of either the state's voters or legislature," the memo said.

 

[Grokmaster]

Trump lied about the threat of COVID, calling it "the sniffles" to his brain-dead supporters like you, who repeated that lie, while telling Woodward in private that it's very deadly and passed through the air.

So that's how he killed 200,000+ people and counting, and why you bear personal responsibility for this pandemic as well.

UTTER BULLSHIT. SAME OLD LIES.

A MONTH AFTER CHINA TRAVEL BAN:




Nancy Pelosi - Chinatown - February 24, 2020

AND THEN THIS:

 

[Grokmaster]

 

[LV426]

A MONTH AFTER CHINA TRAVEL BAN:

A month after the China "travel ban" that wasn't a ban, 40,000 people came from China and weren't screened, traced, tested, or quarantined.

Trump's loopholes in that China "travel ban" likely led to more spread of the virus.

Besides, I thought it was "a hoax"?

 

[Controlled Opposition]

Your so-called President publicly announced that ballots need to be disregarded in the upcoming election, his intent to add a Conservative judge before the election and to have the election put in the hands of the court. The same ballots that he uses. That most of Congress uses. That have been used without controversy for generations. And then made the comment "Four more years! And then four more after that...."

The nominee he wants to put up doesn't think women should be allowed to vote. Believes that each household should only have 1 vote and that be submitted by the male head of household. Wants to overturn gay rights and women's rights. Women not allowed to vote but a woman can be on the Supreme court...

Links? I look at those who thanked your post, and it disappoints me greatly.

 

[WalterWilson]

Wrong. Do you have a job that depends on a robust economy? Do you have a job? Do you pay into a retirement that depends on a strong stock market? Do you have prescriptions that have to be filled on a regular basis? The hope of conservative judge appointments was the only reason I voted for him in 2016.



You’re right there. And nothing they’ve done Or said in the past has proven that’s NOT their intention.



Typical line to throw in by someone from the left I could have predicted it. Not worth any further response.



You deny the expansion of socialism that so many on the left desire? Just like the gun issue... nothing they’ve done Or said in the past has proven that’s NOT their intention.



Hatred? Maybe of a way of life we don’t desire. You want to talk about hatred...I thought I saw hatred on the right when Clinton was president and everything he did was magnified and even sometimes distorted by those on the right. No, that wasn’t hatred. The left’s attitude toward this president is white hot hate that they don’t even try to disguise or hide.



“Forgo moral principles”? Do you on the left not realize that is exactly what you’re asking us to do when you think we should vote for those who think it’s ok to kill babies, who think it’s ok for some kid to decide what gender he/she wants to be, who think some able bodied people ought to be allowed to choose whether they work for a living or not...etc. ??? That’s a poor choice of lines.



I’d rather be a pawn for the side that stands for more things I stand for (Exhibit A - Supreme Court Justices) than for the side who can’t decide which public bathroom to use.



Nope. I’m not that naive. I’ll leave that trait to those on the left.

The first part of my post that you quoted, was written by a Trump supporter. It was a copy paste from another message board. I just had to change a couple of personal identifiers to make it speak to the general public instead of somebody in particular that was named in that original post.

So maybe conservative judges were important to you but that’s not the general consensus. That’s just icing on the cake and even so, the judicial system is not supposed to be biased by political affiliation. The judicial system is supposed to be separate from political affiliation. Justice should be drawn from the rule of law and from precedence.

Second, maybe you don’t know me very well but I’m a conservative. With a few left leanings but not many. For one thing, I am a gun advocate. I’ve been hearing about people coming for our guns for as long as I’ve been an adult and I’m probably older than you are. Nobody has come for any guns. And if anybody tries coming for our guns, I can tell you that where I live in Central Illinois, they will have a very, very difficult time.

so now that you know that I am not a liberal or somebody from the left, your accusing me of being one when it comes to brown skinned people just got thrown out the window. But Donald Trump recently has made statements that if Joe Biden wins. the suburbs will fall and specifically he’s talking about minorities invading the suburbs.

Without going through the rest of your comments I’m just gonna say one more thing and that’s about the hatred of the left. Look at the post that I quoted and see what someone wrote. He doesn’t trust anything written or said by anybody from the left. That’s exactly what I’m talking about. What if he said he doesn’t trust anything written or said by a woman? That’s exactly what I’m talking about. What if he said he doesn’t trust anything written or sent by a woman?What if he said that he doesn’t trust anything written or said by somebody of color? The bottom line is where ever you people on the right get your rhetoric from, whether it’s Fox News for Tucker Carlson or Breitbart Or wherever it comes from, it’s primary intent is to instill hatred of the left. It’s easier to get you to vote against your opponent if you see that opponent as your enemy. As somebody that you hate.

 

[Yakuda]

https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...e-electors-plan-loyalists-swing-states-2020-9

The Trump campaign is weighing a postelection strategy that would bypass the results in key swing states by installing electors who would vote for the president in the Electoral College even if he loses, The Atlantic reported.

Using a rationale of baseless claims about widespread voter fraud and other irregularities with mail ballots, President Donald Trump "would ask state legislators to set aside the popular vote and exercise their power to choose a slate of electors directly," The Atlantic's Barton Gellman wrote, adding that "the longer Trump succeeds in keeping the vote count in doubt, the more pressure legislators will feel to act before the safe-harbor deadline expires."

Experts have said that moves by state legislatures to appoint their own slate of presidential electors after the election would violate federal law, because Congress enacted a statute in 1845 requiring states to appoint their electors to the Electoral College on Election Day.

Many states have expanded access to voting by mail and, either legislatively or pursuant to court orders, extended deadlines by which ballots can be received — moves that could reduce the number of disenfranchised voters.

In previous years, enough of the vote has been counted by Election Day for networks and newspapers to announce a winner. Importantly, the results of any election are never finalized on election night; in most places, it takes officials days or weeks to fully canvass and then certify the results.

But as more Americans this year are expected to cast mail ballots, which take longer to process and count than in-person votes, it's very likely that there won't be enough ballots counted to declare a winner on election night.

During the canvassing process, canvassing boards — which are usually composed of county-level election officials — process and tabulate not just the ballots of people who voted in person, but absentee and mail-in ballots, provisional ballots, and ballots from overseas and military voters.

With the key swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin unable to legally process or count absentee ballots until Election Day, and with ongoing legal disputes over ballots received after Election Day, the Trump campaign is reportedly looking to cast doubt on the results and extend the battle to Inauguration Day.

The Trump campaign's plan would focus on pivotal swing states with Republican-led legislatures, including Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Arizona and Florida also have Republican governors, while the latter states have Democratic governors.
How would this plan work, and how might it backfire?

While Americans have a right to one vote, there is no constitutional right to vote for the president, and Americans don't directly elect the president. Each state appoints a certain number of electors that corresponds to its number of US House representatives and senators.

The Electoral College was conceived at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a compromise between those who wanted Americans to elect presidents directly and those who wanted Congress to have the deciding vote.

Under Article II of the Constitution, state legislatures have the authority to appoint their states' electors in a manner they determine — which legislatures could cite as a justification for directly appointing loyal Trump electors.

But an effort by a legislature to go rogue and override the results of the popular vote in the state could backfire and be more trouble than it's worth.

As the National Task Force on Election Crises explained in a recent legal memo, federal law doesn't require state legislatures to hold popular elections, but it does require states to appoint their slate of electors on Election Day, or the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

State legislatures that attempt to appoint their own slate of Trump electors after the election would likely spur court challenges and risk having Congress decide how the state can allocate its electoral votes.

The "safe harbor" deadline, by which states must certify their results without risking congressional involvement, falls on December 8 this year. Six days later, the electors convene to vote.

The task force's memo noted that "the consequences of failing to adhere" to the safe-harbor requirements established by federal law "are significant."

"Losing the safe harbor protection leaves Congress to decide which electors to count from a state, without mandatory deference to the preferences of either the state's voters or legislature," the memo said.

You realize electors are free to vote for who they want, right? In fact the dems encourged electors to select Hillary in the 2016 election so what the hell are you whining about?

 

[Code1211]

Crazy post by crazy poster is crazy. That's the only reply needed to this pure Fox propaganda.

Asking that both candidates be mistreated in the same way by all is FOX propaganda?

You're funny.

 

[TexanManWithPlans]

BTW, do you have any idea of how stupid that sounds?? You don't trust what any leftist says?? Good job playing right into what I've been saying.

Policy and beliefs mean nothing to Trump supporters. You don't support him because he's making your lives better or Conservative judges or Roe vs Wade or any of that.

You support Trump for one reason - you've been led to believe that the left is coming for your guns, is allowing brown skinned people to take over your neighborhoods and your jobs and that left is trying to bring full blown Communism and/or Socialism to the USA. This isn't political differences. It's pure, unadulterated hatred and Trump has successfully tapped into that hatred.

This misguided belief has instilled such a deep-rooted hatred for the Left that you'll forgo your own moral principles and common sense, your own safety and the very Constitution you pretend to stand for, to make sure that the Left is defeated.

Your pawns. And you celebrate being pawns because you're so brainwashed, you don't realize that you're nothing but pawns.

I suppose you think think people on the right never lie or skew things or exhibit personal bias in anything they say or write, right??

Lame....

One of the most truthful posts here.

 

[Earl]

One of the most truthful posts here.

No Micky, it isn't but it is one of the most grammatically incorrect posts here.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

It astounds me because Republicans use to paint themselves as the standard bearer of morality, decency and the Constitutional Way, not anymore.

I'm not sure why you say that......after all, it's your party that supports arson and violence as a "peaceful protest" against the actions of policemen hired by your party against your political base and then blame the opposing party for all of it.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

The country should have listened to leftist on many of occassions, we were right most recently about Iraq. We were right, once again about tax cuts for the rich being bad for the economy and now we are right about Donald J Trump and his authoritarian desires.

you were wrong most recently yesterday, and the day before that, and last week and last month and last year.........if you have to all the way back to 2002 to find the most recent time you were right we shouldn't pay any attention to you at all.........

tax cuts for the rich (and everyone else as well) was not bad for the economy........we had the best economic indicators in the last fifty years until Covid which obviously had nothing to do with tax cuts........just one more thing you've been wrong about since 2002......