Mason Michaels
Verified User
Insightful,and spot on post!Straight to the point!
I saw that and am wondering:
What reason would they have to come forward and place their reputations and their selves to be in the spot light??
Thanks for admitting you support sexual abuse of women by rich powerful men.
" Kavanaugh Circus Could Destroy the Me Too Movement"
Conservative womanizers HOPE!
Total lack of insight, but he and others are misogynist, even some of the women.Yep.
anatta routinely posts crap like this but doesn't understand why he is called a misogynist.
Total lack of insight.
When was your last post? Stop it; your ignorance is only exceeded by your buffoonish lying. You don't have to be a dishonest hack every damned day. Take the day off once in a while.
it's a political concept. It has nothing to do with misogynist. Metoo is weakened or not.Yep.
anatta routinely posts crap like this but doesn't understand why he is called a misogynist.
Total lack of insight.
LIE: The Weinstein claims, like the claims here, were basically he-said/she-said claims.
LIE: Republicans were eager to believe, even when just the first few came out, because Weinstein was a well-known liberal.
LIE: Now they'd like to impose a totally different standard, because it's one of their boys.
There, I hope that cleared things up for you hack.
STUPID and DISHONEST: In what sense do you think Dems have abused this? The Democratic Party of the Jackass abused this by sitting on the letter until the last minute, of the last hour, of the last day you dishonest dunce.
STUPID and DISHONEST: What are the Democrats supposed to do, in your mind? Should they say "sorry -- unless you've got hard evidence, we have no interest in hearing your story"? Now you pretend that this wasn't all planned and brought out on the last minute, of the last hour of the last day. You're a dishonest hyper partisan hack on steroids.
I hope this part is clear now. STFU, seriously
oh for fucs sake. give it up. discussion of whether meetoo is damaged or not is not "misogynist"Total lack of insight, but he and others are misogynist, even some of the women.
LIE: The Weinstein claims, like the claims here, were basically he-said/she-said claims.
LIE: Republicans were eager to believe, even when just the first few came out, because Weinstein was a well-known liberal.
LIE: Now they'd like to impose a totally different standard, because it's one of their boys.
There, I hope that cleared things up for you hack.
STUPID and DISHONEST: In what sense do you think Dems have abused this? The Democratic Party of the Jackass abused this by sitting on the letter until the last minute, of the last hour, of the last day you dishonest dunce.
STUPID and DISHONEST: What are the Democrats supposed to do, in your mind? Should they say "sorry -- unless you've got hard evidence, we have no interest in hearing your story"? Now you pretend that this wasn't all planned and brought out on the last minute, of the last hour of the last day. You're a dishonest hyper partisan hack on steroids.
I hope this part is clear now. STFU, seriously
What statement do you think I made that is a lie, specifically? And what evidence do you see that it's a lie? This shouldn't be hard. Identify exactly what I said that you think was a lie, and then provide the evidence it was a lie. You've quoted some things I've said, but provided no evidence they were lies.
it's a political concept. It has nothing to do with misogynist. Metoo is weakened or not.
Yes I know you always think you are justified.
oh for fucs sake. give it up. discussion of whether meetoo is damaged or not is not "misogynist"
Gully, my man.
Where have you been hiding?
I do not get to decide. I get to bring the issue up. doing so isn't misogynistThinking it could be hurt by this dog and pony show is.
Sorry but you don't get to decide.
Total lack of insight, but he and others are misogynist, even some of the women.
I do not get to decide. I get to bring the issue up. doing so isn't misogynist
I had some shit to work out. I'm good now though. You still killing it?