NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and

Wolverine said:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08...e-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html


NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels

Friday, August 30, 2019 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: axial tilt, climate change, climate science, Earth, environment, global warming, NASA, real investigations, solar orbit
462KViews
Image: NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels

(Natural News) For more than 60 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has known that the changes occurring to planetary weather patterns are completely natural and normal. But the space agency, for whatever reason, has chosen to let the man-made global warming hoax persist and spread, to the detriment of human freedom.

It was the year 1958, to be precise, when NASA first observed that changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth’s axial tilt, are both responsible for what climate scientists today have dubbed as “warming” (or “cooling,” depending on their agenda). In no way, shape, or form are humans warming or cooling the planet by driving SUVs or eating beef, in other words.

But NASA has thus far failed to set the record straight, and has instead chosen to sit silently back and watch as liberals freak out about the world supposedly ending in 12 years because of too much livestock, or too many plastic straws.

In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity. But, again, this information has yet to go mainstream, some 19 years later, which is why deranged, climate-obsessed leftists have now begun to claim that we really only have 18 months left before the planet dies from an excess of carbon dioxide (CO2).

The truth, however, is much more along the lines of what Serbian astrophysicist Milutin Milankovitch, after whom the Milankovitch Climate Theory is named, proposed about how the seasonal and latitudinal variations of solar radiation that hit the earth in different ways, and at different times, have the greatest impact on earth’s changing climate patterns.
Click to expand...
With all the shit Beijing and Mexico City have been pumping into the air, how could they say otherwise?
 
moon said:
Just produce proof of NASA's pre- 1958 denial of global - warming factors that weren't detected then.

Probably simpler to just fuck off.
Click to expand...
Right after you produce proof that Beijing and Mexico City are burning to a crisp.
 
archives said:
It is always the same, Flat Earthers come up with some "study" from some recognized climate denier site and attempt to create a false paradigm, as if it immediately cancels out the preponderance of scientific evidence in the other direction
Click to expand...

Is that why Mann just lost a lawsuit because he refused to put forth the data and adjustments he used to create his bogus hockey stick? Because he had a preponderance of evidence?

He refused because he knows how easy it would be to show his work is a fraud. There is no other reason for him to refuse.
 
Cypress said:
For the past two decades I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature, to support their claims and assertions.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.
Click to expand...

For the past two decades you have been asked why it is your heros consistently hide their data 'adjustments' from the world. You continually run away every time you are asked. Your hero Mann just lost a lawsuit because once again he ran like a coward from showing the adjustments to data he used to create his bullshit hockey stick... something cultists like you still believe is factual.

Why is it that every time one of your cultists adjusts data it reduces temps from the earlier records and increases temps in later records?

Why do they constantly hide? Oh yeah, because they are lying to you.
 
Truth Detector said:
No one takes your bullshit seriously when you start every post with a lie, fabrication or strawman shit-for-brains. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It is always his sanctimonious 'look how enlightened I am' crap. He cannot help it. His self loathing is likely very overwhelming. He knows how pathetic he is. That must be hard to live with.
 
Superfreak said:
In this case, it is valid. That is a crackpot site. Its sites like that that the AGW fearmongering cult actually love, because then they can pretend all 'deniers' are like that.
Click to expand...

No it's never valid when the "source" is a simple summation from a link contained in the article. And that link describes the Milankovitch Theory of climate based on the seasonal and latitudinal variations of solar radiation received by the Earth, a well-known standard which NASA itself proved in the year 2000.
 
Climate change occurs for a number of reasons, and always will.

But nothing that job killing regulations, or green energy "deals" is going to alter one way or the other.

If one side wants to play political football with fear mongering, let them have at it.
Should be fun
 
Superfreak said:
By all means, please list the 'branches' of climate scientists. Then define each branch.
Click to expand...

After that show how the conglomeration of the various branches has proven humans have caused 'climate change' but only after 'climate change' is defined. Good luck.
 
anonymoose said:
OK, Now show me an actual study that concludes the sun has nothing to do with GW and GW is completely attributed to SUV's and farting cows. Just one.
Click to expand...

Here's what you can expect from the brain dead, dishonest left:

giphy.gif
 
Centerleftfl said:
Notice how MOST REPUBLICANs use the term "Climate change". In science climate change and GLOBAL WARMING have scientific differences but are essentially the same (it's an 'over time' thing). They are both used by CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.
Click to expand...

Have you noticed how leftists call anyone who disagrees with them flat earther's or climate deniers? STFU you whiny low IQ hypocrite. :rolleyes:
 
Oh look, an academic source. Attack this, liberals. lol

http://academic.emporia.edu/aberjame/student/howard2/theory.htm

The Milankovitch theory is an explanation of long term climate change. Milankovitch built his theory from previous work done by J.A. Adhemar and James Croll. In 1842 Adhemar explained glacial climate using only precession (Davis, 2002). In 1864 Croll wrote about orbital change and the ice of the Ice Ages using both the eccentricity cycle and the precession cycle. Later in 1875 he took into account obliquity (tilt of the axis) cycle (Davis, 2002).
Milankovitch, being a mathematician, took Croll's work and set out to develop a mathematical theory of climate change. His theory states "that as the Earth travels through space around the sun cyclical variations in three elements of Earth-sun geometry combine to produce variations in the amount of solar energy that reaches Earth (Kaufman, 2002). These three elements that have cyclic variations are eccentricity, obliquity, and precession.
Eccentricity is a term used to describe the shape of Earth's orbit around the sun. The variation of Earth's orbit around the sun ranges from an almost exact circle (eccentricity = 0.0005) to a slightly elongated shape (eccentricity = 0.0607) (Thomas, 2002). The time frame for the cycle is approximately 98,000 years (Davis, 2002). The impact of the variation is a change in the amount of solar energy from perihelion (around January 3) to aphelion (around July 4). Currently the Earth's eccentricity is 0.016 and there is about a 6.4 percent increase in insolation from July to January (Berger, 2001). Thomas (2002) states,
"The eccentricity influences seasonal differences: when the Earth is closest to the
sun, it gets more solar radiation. If the occurs during the winter, the winter is less
severe. If a hemisphere has its summer while closest to the sun, summers are
relatively warm."

Obliquity is the variation of the tilt of the earth's axis away from the orbital plane. The tilt varies between 22.1o and 24.5o and the average is 23.5o (Kaufman, 2002). The obliquity changes on a cycle taking approximately 40,000 years. As this tilt changes, the seasons become more exaggerated. Kaufman (2002) states "the more tilt means more severe seasons - warmer summers and colder winters; less tilt means less severe seasons - cooler summers and milder winters." For an increase of 1o in obliquity, the total energy received by the summer hemisphere increases by approximately 1% (Berger, 2001). The cool summers are thought to allow for the yearly build up of snow and ice in high latitudes, possibly leading to the development of an ice sheet (Kaufman, 2002). Obliquity change alos causes equatorward motion of the tropical circles and the poleward motion of the polar circles. Currently this motion is 1.4 km/century as the obliquity decreases -46.85 inches/century (Berger, 2001).

Precession is the change in orientation of the Earth's rotational axis. The precession cycle takes about 19,000 - 23,000 years. Precession is caused by two factors: a wobble of the Earth's axis and a turning around of the elliptical orbit of the Earth itself (Thomas, 2002). Obliquity affected the tilt of the Earth's axis, precession affects the direction of the Earth's axis. The change in the axis location changes the dates of perihelion (closest distance from sun) and aphelion (farthest distance from sun), and this increases the seasonal contrast in one hemisphere while decreasing it in the other hemisphere ( Kaufman, 2002). currently, the Earth is closest to the sun in the northern hemisphere winter, which makes the winters there less severe (Thomas, 2002). Another consequence of precession is a shift in the celestial poles. 5000 years ago the North Star was Thuban in the constellation Draco. Currently the North Star is Polaris in the constellation Ursa Minor.

"Using these three orbital variations, Milankovitch was able to formulate a comprehensive mathematical model that calculated latitudinal differences in insolation and the corresponding surface temperature for 600,000 years prior to the year 1800"(Kaufman, 2002). These variations are correlated in the figure below.

variate.gif


His theory concludes that ice caps at the poles increased and decreased in size as a reflection of the insolation at high latitudes. Specifically, he used calculations from the 65°N to develop his model.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top