NY Times 'Bombshell’ Unravels=> Clapper Admits Papadopoulos "not on my radar"

Cypress said:
www.thegatewaypundit.com????

"The Gateway Pundit is a right-wing, far-right, pro-Trump website." - Wikipedia
Click to expand...
Why do you think he cites them?

I like the way they use Papadapolous as some proof that the timing is off. It was Australian intelligence that alerted the American intelligence agencies about what they heard, after the emails were made public by the Russians. They didn't have to mention the 'coffee boy'.
 
Stretch said:
The investigation couldn't have been about Pap if Clap had never heard of him...and Fusion GPS is using this crapola to try and divert attention away from the dossier and their hand in it, too??? They're scrambling to find the right lie to give the public. Which one do YOU believe? Do you even understand what's going on here or are you just robotically and without discernment believing every single thing you hear that sounds like that will be the one that brings Trump down?
Click to expand...
Incorrect on all counts. Fusion is demanding that Congress release entire transcripts of their testimony, instead of allowing Nunes to redact testimony, and publicize lies and exaggerations.

Coffee Boy didn't have to be mentioned in a notification that the Russian hacks were part of a plan between them, and trump.
 
Covfefe said:
It sounds like you are the one willing to believe anything that come out against the investigation without discernment. There are a myriad of reasons Clapper may have not been aware of Papadopolous; the FBI, CIA and DNI are all seperate agencies and we do not know what information they were sharing.
Click to expand...

You're all over the place. We're putting up alllllll the stories coming out on this. Not you and the left. So you tell us.............just which story do YOU specifically subscribe to? What exact evidence do YOU see in all of these stories that convinces you of YOUR stance?
 
Covfefe said:
Yes, and Mueller is piecing it all together :)
Click to expand...

So, you have no clue...........just that Mueller is piecing this all together. Right. He's not even concerned with this ruse anymore. He's moved on to fishing in the sea of obstruction, LOL. Watch more news.
 
Stretch said:
You're all over the place. We're putting up alllllll the stories coming out on this. Not you and the left. So you tell us.............just which story do YOU specifically subscribe to? What exact evidence do YOU see in all of these stories that convinces you of YOUR stance?
Click to expand...
I subscribe to the investigations is still continuing and there are a lot of angles to this story and we don’t know how much all the agencies share information, but we do know Mueller is putting it all together.
 
Darth Omar said:
They can’t use the dossier as a basis for the Russian investigation because it’s unverified and slanderous. So they say it was based on a conversation between a couple of drunks lol.

What happened was the Hillary campaign/DNC complex, along with Podesta, started Russia mania; Strzok picked up the ball [the insurance policy-Dossier] and other actors ran with it.

Nunes is being stonewalled because the Dossier *really is* the only basis for the investigation, the usual suspects don’t want to talk about it and the Two Drunks is a diversion.

Sounds like we need an outside investigator to come in and look at it.
Click to expand...

Summed up perfectly! :thumbsup:

inspector-clouseau.jpg
 
Stretch said:
So, you have no clue...........just that Mueller is piecing this all together. Right. He's not even concerned with this ruse anymore. He's moved on to fishing in the sea of obstruction, LOL. Watch more news.
Click to expand...
Lol, oh, okay that’s why we have two guilty pleas and two indictments, but you keep on believing it’s a ruse if it helps
 
Stretch said:
You're all over the place. We're putting up alllllll the stories coming out on this. Not you and the left. So you tell us.............just which story do YOU specifically subscribe to? What exact evidence do YOU see in all of these stories that convinces you of YOUR stance?
Click to expand...

I am willing to consider the possibility that Trump did not do anything knowingly and criminally wrong.
I have generally have faith in our institutions of justice, and in the capability of FBI investigators.
By training and disposition, I am generally not the type to leap to conclusions, and I try (not always successfully) to keep myself on guard against confirmation bias.

You and your rightwing friends on the other hand, were chanting for Hillary to go to jail on substantially less evidence than exists against member of the Trump campaign.
And did you once put a lot of weight and stock in the claim from a quack that you were going to be raptured last September 23rd?

You might want to practice some introspection on your capacity to be deliberative and thoughtful in reaching well reasoned conclusions.
 
Covfefe said:
Lol, oh, okay that’s why we have two guilty pleas and two indictments, but you keep on believing it’s a ruse if it helps
Click to expand...

Oooooooooo...horrible crimes, too. Process crimes. They're looking for jaywalking and littering next I imagine since they can't find collusion.
 
Stretch said:
Oooooooooo...horrible crimes, too. Process crimes. They're looking for jaywalking and littering next I imagine since they can't find collusion.
Click to expand...
At this point, we don’t know what Mueller has discovered. The investigation continues.
 
Cypress said:
I am willing to consider the possibility that Trump did not do anything knowingly and criminally wrong.
I have generally have faith in our institutions of justice, and in the capability of FBI investigators.
By training and disposition, I am generally not the type to leap to conclusions, and I try (not always successfully) to keep myself on guard against confirmation bias.

You and your rightwing friends on the other hand, were chanting for Hillary to go to jail on substantially less evidence than exists against member of the Trump campaign.
And did you once put a lot of weight and stock in the claim from a quack that you were going to be raptured last September 23rd?

You might want to practice some introspection on your capacity to be deliberative and thoughtful in reaching well reasoned conclusions.
Click to expand...
She certainly shows she is gullible.
 
Cypress said:
I am willing to consider the possibility that Trump did not do anything knowingly and criminally wrong.
I have generally have faith in our institutions of justice, and in the capability of FBI investigators.
By training and disposition, I am generally not the type to leap to conclusions, and I try (not always successfully) to keep myself on guard against confirmation bias.

You and your rightwing friends on the other hand, were chanting for Hillary to go to jail on substantially less evidence than exists against member of the Trump campaign.
And did you once put a lot of weight and stock in the claim from a quack that you were going to be raptured last September 23rd?

You might want to practice some introspection on your capacity to be deliberative and thoughtful in reaching well reasoned conclusions.
Click to expand...

Focus problem, much?
Yeah, I guess when Hillary was smashing evidence, getting debate answers, watching Bubba meet with Lynch and having Comey accuse her of lying and "gross negligence".........locking her up seemed like a good idea.
 
Stretch said:
Focus problem, much?
Yeah, I guess when Hillary was smashing evidence, getting debate answers, watching Bubba meet with Lynch and having Comey accuse her of lying and "gross negligence".........locking her up seemed like a good idea.
Click to expand...

^HDT

Hillary Diversionary Tactic
 
domer76 said:
^HDT

Hillary Diversionary Tactic
Click to expand...
Did Comey accuse Hillary of lying? I’m not sure that is correct, getting debate questions isn’t a crime, it’s cheating, but not criminal, what Bubba did, not illegal, it was stupid, but nothing criminal, the smashing was looked at by FBI, no charges. Seems like Clinton was investigated, they just don’t like the outcome.
 
"were going to be raptured last September 23rd" ???????????????


All these months later and you STILL haven't read exactly what I said there?

"2017 Time for possible Rapture???" (8-15-17)
"Nobody including myself has "predicted" an exact day, hour and minute of the Rapture." (8-15-17)
"This could be the Rapture prior to the Great Tribulation." (8-17-17)
"As I mentioned early on though, I am looking for something of significance regarding Israel on or around that date. The Rapture sure would be nice though." (9-19-17)
 
Covfefe said:
Did Comey accuse Hillary of lying? I’m not sure that is correct, getting debate questions isn’t a crime, it’s cheating, but not criminal, what Bubba did, not illegal, it was stupid, but nothing criminal, the smashing was looked at by FBI, no charges. Seems like Clinton was investigated, they just don’t like the outcome.
Click to expand...

Best description of collusion and miscarriage of justice I've ever seen. Brilliant. Thank-you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top