Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?


  • Total voters
    32
  • This poll will close: .
Dude, we are grown-ups. We give a reaction when someone says something that induces that feeling towards them. We aren't doing it just because of who they are.
Who's "we" ? NHB and Drunkle Thinskin are for sure.
Did we whine all those years when Earl, Teflon, or Tommy were groaning everything under the sun? No.
Same with this. Nobody started whining about this until Damo's OP.
The question is, who is whining,
You're kidding, right? Drunkle has been whining nonstop about this subject since this thread was started.
He whines about most everything though.
and why are you catering to them?
He's not. Nothing's been done.
You sound like you want to enact the change despite the results of this poll.
What change? He hasn't proposed any.
If there aren't good and bad marks, or at least good and neutral, what's the point?
There's even less point in a neutral. No remark does the same.
 
That's true. It was a few years back; I had to repeat the request when we got this new interface because the FI fell off in the transfer. I hear that to this day, though, Goatyurt is *still* whining and carping about the FI. What an odd hobby. lol
Translation: Fowl cries and bitches to Damo about anyone that she deems problematic. The ones she fears and embarrasses her so easily. When talking about the 'one' that she really hates, you can tell the thing she absolutely hates more than anything is the fact that people actually like her here and respect her. Fowl learned what all morons like her learn eventually. No matter how many sycophants she keeps around, they don't compare to just one person that actually respects and admires her. The evil bitch has never experienced respect, she can only dream about what it must feel like. That causes more hatred and bitterness and of course extreme jealousy.

I was recently treated to a previous post by Fowl where she clearly doxed TOP and got away with it. Maybe Fowl could share the evidence she claims exists, lol. I won't hold my breath.

Fowl, I know you hate the fact that TOP is respected and liked. I know it kills you that all you have is a collection of JPP's dumbest members on your side. I know the fact that TOP was a teacher absolutely drives you crazy. I'm left wondering if you tried to become a teacher and failed, or maybe you wanted to be one, but your lazy ass kept you glued to the couch. Who knows, but I think it's hilarious that it pisses off you and your clan of simpletons so much. Thanks for the entertainment.
 
Who's "we" ? NHB and Drunkle Thinskin are for sure.

Same with this. Nobody started whining about this until Damo's OP.

You're kidding, right? Drunkle has been whining nonstop about this subject since this thread was started.
He whines about most everything though.

He's not. Nothing's been done.

What change? He hasn't proposed any.

There's even less point in a neutral. No remark does the same.
Anymouse is pissy because people are onto his crimes.
 
You made a few contradictory statements on this thread. Which ones am I supposed to believe?
Well. The ones where I specifically tell you an action that I may or may not take would be a good place to start. The rest are all just ways to get more information.

If you follow that rule you will find:

1. That I am going to create a modification that will allow people to ignore reaction notifications from specific users.
2. That I was curious.
3. That I haven't made any decision regarding the points system, but started the thread due to curiosity.
4. Well... You can follow the pattern yourself.

Posts where I ask a question or give a "well it would make this happen" but do not say any action that I may or may not take should be taken as posts where I am not telling you any action I may or may not take. I think even you, with your crippled sarcasm sensor you obtained the day you became a confirmed leftist, can figure that one out.
 
Well. The ones where I specifically tell you an action that I may or may not take would be a good place to start. The rest are all just ways to get more information.
If you follow that rule you will find:
1. That I am going to create a modification that will allow people to ignore reaction notifications from specific users.
2. That I was curious.
3. That I haven't made any decision regarding the points system, but started the thread due to curiosity.
4. Well... You can follow the pattern yourself.

Posts where I ask a question or give a "well it would make this happen" but do not say any action that I may or may not take should be taken as posts where I am not telling you any action I may or may not take. I think even you, with your crippled sarcasm sensor you obtained the day you became a confirmed leftist, can figure that one out.
You and I both know what that decision will be. I even have a bet on it. :)
 
You and I both know what that decision will be. I even have a bet on it. :)
You do? Interesting. I have actually informed people what the most likely result will be. See if you can find it. It's in this thread. Who did you bet? You probably shouldn't bet on things like that, you do not have the emotional intelligence of a tsetse fly, cannot understand me even slightly, and will almost always be wrong.
 
You do? Interesting. I have actually informed people what the most likely result will be. See if you can find it. It's in this thread. Who did you bet?
You probably shouldn't bet on things like that, you do not have the emotional intelligence of a tsetse fly, cannot understand me even slightly, and will almost always be wrong.
Time will tell, but you've been telegraphing it for weeks.
If that was true, then why does your girlfriend fear me so much that she needs you to protect her?
 
Time will tell, but you've been telegraphing it for weeks.
If that was true, then why does your girlfriend fear me so much that she needs you to protect her?
Give me some evidence of this "fear"... So far absolutely nobody has complained to me about anything other than the notification issue, which will be resolved by the modification, and those were from long ago. I promised this modification months ago but wanted to make sure the migration completed and was solid before I started on it.

My curiosity though. This thread has been educational. Very much so. The people watching is EPIC...
 
Give me some evidence of this "fear"... So far absolutely nobody has complained to me about anything other than the notification issue, which will be resolved by the modification, and those were from long ago. I promised this modification months ago but wanted to make sure the migration completed and was solid before I started on it.

My curiosity though. This thread has been educational. Very much so. The people watching is EPIC...
Sure. Examples:
One way forced ignore.
Special rules created for me.
Your interpretation of non-existent rules such as "violating forced ignore".
You're attacks on "leftists" who disagree with you for doing what your MAGAt friends do.

Agreed. I love to people watch. :)
 
Sure. Examples:
One way forced ignore.
Special rules created for me.
Your interpretation of non-existent rules such as "violating forced ignore".
You're attacks on "leftists" who disagree with you for doing what your MAGAt friends do.

Agreed. I love to people watch. :)
lol.

Not a rule, a tool. One way was because of a vote among the mods.

And I simply fixed the ignore feature so it actually works correctly instead of having a "view post" link that allowed people to respond to folks they were ignoring. None of that was someone else whining to me. Nobody "violated" forced ignore. You simply were clicking the "view post" link and the software let you respond making it useless to its purpose. I fixed that.

I am sarcastic to leftists, yes. Only you seem to cry about it, well, you and your proxy.
 
Biased application or interpretation of the rules always piques my curiosity. Yes, I do. You claimed I had one and are now clearly running from your own post. Why?
You send your proxy in to read and give you information about what Lionfish is saying about you. "She" (I'm not sure if she's a sock yet, but definitely is your "good left arm") downvotes posts about you regularly, shows up each time you cry to me to "support" your cry.

She's a proxy. There is no rule about proxies, so it doesn't matter... you and your proxy are literally the only ones crying to me about this.
 
You send your proxy in to read and give you information about what Lionfish is saying about you. "She" (I'm not sure if she's a sock yet, but definitely is your "good left arm") downvotes posts about you regularly, shows up each time you cry to me to "support" your cry.

She's a proxy. There is no rule about proxies, so it doesn't matter... you and your proxy are literally the only ones crying to me about this.
Who?

Interesting that you claim to know who is and who isn't a sock when it's your GF, but not when it's a "leftist".
 
Back
Top