Poll: Should all reactions generate a positive score?

Should every reaction bring positive points?

  • Total voters
    20
  • This poll will close: .
Moosakofsky said:
If they “privately” cried to damo how do you “know” they did?
Click to expand...
Having trouble reading and understanding standard rudimentary English?

I didn't state that I knew. I clearly wrote that I was inferring.
👇​
Cypress said:
For posters who routinely stated they didn't give a rat's ass about neg reps, they seem to be privately crying like little girls to Damo about it.
Click to expand...
 
Damocles said:
Nobody cries more than you, Dear Dunkle.
Click to expand...
Oh, Damocletus. Your personal attention to me is interesting. Did I cry to you about the point system? No. Who did?

Who has your ear so close that you want to change a system you've had for years? Who is whining so loudly that you're repeatedly sought to change the system to favor your friends?
 
Moosakofsky said:
If they “privately” cried to damo how do you “know” they did?
Click to expand...
Results count. Why else would Damocletus make extra work for himself if he didn't have a bunch of mewling sissy boys whining him about their reaction scores?

Your own multiple public complaints indicate you've made private complaints too.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Oh, Damocletus. Your personal attention to me is interesting. Did I cry to you about the point system? No. Who did?

Who has your ear so close that you want to change a system you've had for years? Who is whining so loudly that you're repeatedly sought to change the system to favor your friends?
Click to expand...
No, like a professional mourner, you cry publicly, loudly, repeatedly, and incessantly.

This post I am quoting is a great example. You want specific people to see you as a victim, so you cry loudly...

Nobody at all approached me about anything, nobody... I asked a question, mostly I wanted to see to whom "neg rep" was most important.
 
Damocles said:
No, like a professional mourner, you cry publicly, loudly, repeatedly, and incessantly.

This post I am quoting is a great example. You want specific people to see you as a victim, so you cry loudly...

Nobody at all approached me about anything, nobody... I asked a question, mostly I wanted to see to whom "neg rep" was most important.
Click to expand...
Oh, Damocletus. I'm not a victim. You're just a liar who claims one thing and does another.

The fact you never, ever go up against the Snitch Bitch is the most curious thing about you, IMO. Is she your wife? Daughter? GF? Victims need protection just like you give her. I have no need of protection which is why you make special rules for me. LOL

This is the juiciest example:
Damocles

Thread 'New Rule... Rule 16'

We'll call this new rule the Dutch Uncle rule.

Quote Box Altering:

One can alter a quote box by removing some of a wall of text to expose the specific part you are responding to, or splitting it apart so you can respond to each item one at a time. However, altering the words posted and changing the meaning of what they said for whatever reason (a joke for instance) is not allowed unless you change the "quoted by" portion of the quote to make it clear that the original poster did not post what you are "making" them say. We will begin by deleting these posts, and if it continues we will...
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Oh, Damocletus. Your personal attention to me is interesting. Did I cry to you about the point system? No. Who did?

Who has your ear so close that you want to change a system you've had for years? Who is whining so loudly that you're repeatedly sought to change the system to favor your friends?
Click to expand...
Mr. Tiny Penis, there is nothing in this forum that you haven't complained and cried about.
 
Damocles said:
No, like a professional mourner, you cry publicly, loudly, repeatedly, and incessantly.

This post I am quoting is a great example. You want specific people to see you as a victim, so you cry loudly...

Nobody at all approached me about anything, nobody... I asked a question, mostly I wanted to see to whom "neg rep" was most important.
Click to expand...
Dutch cried so much about me laughing at him that you put him on my forced ignore list. Nothing can stop me from laughing at stolen valor.
 
Damocles said:
The goal is interaction, you get to express how much you like or dislike the other person's post. Since the interaction is happening should it all be positive points? I can create more "reactions", and I think it may stop those who think these points can be spent like cash from constantly reacting...
Click to expand...
I don't mind reactions at all. Points don't mean anything, tough, except to a few people here with no life.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Who gives a shit? Between Finger Boy's (Diesel) giving me the finger on every post and Duck's Dork (Dutch) vomiting as if he has bulimia on every post I make, it's become an irrelevancy. Toss in the Foul Owl as a third doing the same. When you give everything a thumbs up or down those have no meaning or value. It's like getting a participation trophy.

I, on the other hand, have given out exactly one thumb's up to a post since the board transitioned to this format. One. That has meaning.
Click to expand...
I'll give a thumbs up more often, or a laugh response if someone comes up with a good joke, but I could care less about a point system. The thing that drives long strings of downvotes by losers like Dutch and Diesel is that they think points actually mean something. They have no life other than to try to 'gain favor using points', or 'ruin reputations' by constant downvoting.

I don't mind reactions. It's the point system that's a big meh.
 
CBHype said:
I'm sitting at -110 because there are some members who seek out my posts to give them a negative.
Click to expand...
So? Don't worry about it. It really means nothing, other than going to show how much these members you speak of have no life. They literally have nothing better to do. A point rating to them is the a 'proof of relevance'.

It's a sad behavior, really.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Oh, Damocletus. I'm not a victim. You're just a liar who claims one thing and does another.

The fact you never, ever go up against the Snitch Bitch is the most curious thing about you, IMO. Is she your wife? Daughter? GF? Victims need protection just like you give her. I have no need of protection which is why you make special rules for me. LOL

This is the juiciest example:
Damocles

Thread 'New Rule... Rule 16'

We'll call this new rule the Dutch Uncle rule.

Quote Box Altering:

One can alter a quote box by removing some of a wall of text to expose the specific part you are responding to, or splitting it apart so you can respond to each item one at a time. However, altering the words posted and changing the meaning of what they said for whatever reason (a joke for instance) is not allowed unless you change the "quoted by" portion of the quote to make it clear that the original poster did not post what you are "making" them say. We will begin by deleting these posts, and if it continues we will...
Click to expand...
So you are not a victim, then claim to be a victim! Hilarious!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top