Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY!

It’s illegal to shoot people for a property crime

You are constantly coming up with tripe because you fail to realize your side lost.

When the gang of thugs comes to burn your home ... do you think they care if YOU are inside ??? ATTEMPTED MURDER ONE (along with arson) .
 
So Rittenhouse by carrying a loaded assault weapon into a heated confrontation did not commit a provocation.

Obviously you didn't watch the evidence or see what actually happened. There was no confrontation until the criminal violent thugs decided they could beat down on Kyle.

I am equally amused that morons on the left think that violent looters and arsonists had a right to be there, but law abiding armed citizens trying to protect their businesses and property had no business there.

How fucking stupid are you dumb fucks?
:palm:

He clearly did. It’s why two men lost their lives trying to neutralize the threat he posed.

Kyle posed no threat you lying dumbass. he was running AWAY from the violent criminal thugs. Be less of a moron. :palm:
 
I'm trying very hard not to gloat. But I called Zimmerman correctly and this one. Obvious self defense in both cases, but Rittenhouse should not be allowed to possess a weapon ever without formal training.
Rule #1: Do not bring weapon to a riot unless you are legally part of law enforcement. But I think he probably learned that one.

That's like saying one should not be able to possess a vehicle unless trained. What about a collection of classic and vintage cars?
 
If I’m out I’m going to make it short


It will be a huge killer of commerce


Too much chance of getting dead
 
Ha. And here I thought the loaded assault weapon in his possession was a fact, absent which there would not have to have been a trial at all.

Kyle's weapon doesn't fit the definition of "assaults rifle". It just looks like one. Do you even know what that is? Turn off MSNBC. It's making you retarded. :palm:
 
Back
Top