So, how do you think the school walkout helped? No ban list, accept for Annie

RB 60 said:
You've made no legitimate point. Again, I have no "moral guilt" of any kind. You're accusations are falling on deaf ears. How you (or others here) perceive me makes no difference to me whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Your right. I am falling on deaf ears. Your clearly not smart enough to understand what I'm saying.

You will at some point.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
Your right. I am falling on deaf ears. Your clearly not smart enough to understand what I'm saying.

You will at some point.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Make a little sense and I'm sure we can figure it out.
For the third time, though, I have no "moral" responsibility for what others do. Nor will I take any.
 
itsKingD said:
When did I say or suggest that we should penalize responsible gun owners?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

If an item that is currently legal to buy and possess becomes no longer available because of a NEW LAW, you don't consider that a penalty for those who have committed no illegal act?
 
RB 60 said:
Make a little sense and I'm sure we can figure it out.
For the third time, though, I have no "moral" responsibility for what others do. Nor will I take any.
Click to expand...
OK.. Example.

I'm not sure what case it was, but it involved the killing of an unarmed black man in which the poliece officer involved was indicted on charges of murder.

In a jury of his peers, most were white, all but one white man, accused the officer of being guilty.

Because there was no unanimous decision, obviously he was acquitted.

When word got out, that man was not only perceived by the people, but also by multiple news outlets just as racist and wrong as the officer who actually commited the act. So much so, they had to protect his identity due to death threats.

He claimed he truly didn't feel the officer was guilty and didn't want to sentence him to jail, however;* That didn't stop the general public from lumping them together in the same group.

It's kinda like when those whites we're defending the existence of the Robert E.* Lee statue. They claimed they we're protecting history,* but from my point, and many others, those people are no different and just as "guilty" as the KKK.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
If an item that is currently legal to buy and possess becomes no longer available because of a NEW LAW, you don't consider that a penalty for those who have committed no illegal act?
Click to expand...
So by that logic, I guess you also think the requirement of wearing a seat belt in a car is considered a penalty for drivers right?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
So by that logic, I guess you also think the requirement of wearing a seat belt in a car is considered a penalty for drivers right?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Maybe you could explain yourself and show the connection you're trying to make; because, are seat belts denied to anyone?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Maybe you could explain yourself and show the connection you're trying to make; because, are seat belts denied to anyone?
Click to expand...
OK. Example

The Samsung.. I think 8? The one that was blowing up?
Ok. So many people still have that phone, and it hasn't denoted, yet Samsung discontinued making them because they posed a dangerous hazard.

No ones coming for the phones still in possession by those individuals, however you can't get them anymore because they pose a risk.
Now, is that a penalty or protection?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
OK.. Example.

I'm not sure what case it was, but it involved the killing of an unarmed black man in which the poliece officer involved was indicted on charges of murder.

In a jury of his peers, most were white, all but one white man, accused the officer of being guilty.

Because there was no unanimous decision, obviously he was acquitted.

When word got out, that man was not only perceived by the people, but also by multiple news outlets just as racist and wrong as the officer who actually commited the act. So much so, they had to protect his identity due to death threats.

He claimed he truly didn't feel the officer was guilty and didn't want to sentence him to jail, however;* That didn't stop the general public from lumping them together in the same group.

It's kinda like when those whites we're defending the existence of the Robert E.* Lee statue. They claimed they we're protecting history,* but from my point, and many others, those people are no different and just as "guilty" as the KKK.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?
 
RB 60 said:
For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?
Click to expand...
Is something wrong with your brain that can't comprehend the concept of perception?
Or are you just choosing to ignore?



Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
RB 60 said:
For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?
Click to expand...
....what does neither of us being on the jury trial have ANYTHING AT ALL to do with what I said???

Your over analyzing the situation and is still missing the basic point.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
Is something wrong with your brain that can't comprehend the concept of perception?
Or are you just choosing to ignore?



Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

My perception is adept. Answer the question. I don't think you can, logically anyway.
 
RB 60 said:
My perception is adept. Answer the question. I don't think you can, logically anyway.
Click to expand...
How else am I supposed to answer a question I have already answered multiple times?

I'd like to encourage you to take a couple of classes in humanities and vocabulary. Maybe then you'll understand.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
OK. Example

The Samsung.. I think 8? The one that was blowing up?
Ok. So many people still have that phone, and it hasn't denoted, yet Samsung discontinued making them because they posed a dangerous hazard.

No ones coming for the phones still in possession by those individuals, however you can't get them anymore because they pose a risk.
Now, is that a penalty or protection?

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Did the Government pass a law that denied anyone the ability to buy one?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Did the Government pass a law that denied anyone the ability to buy one?
Click to expand...
For God sakes.

It's about people collectively coming together, identifying a problem and then administrating a solution, that didn't effect owners already in possession of the product.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
 
itsKingD said:
For God sakes.

It's about people collectively coming together, identifying a problem and then administrating a solution, that didn't effect owners already in possession of the product.

Sent from my SM-G530T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

People can individual or collectively do as they wish, the Government is another matter.
 
RB 60 said:
For the fourth and final time. As a gun owner, what responsibility do I share with the assholes who commit gun crimes?
Answer the damn question.

PS: Don't even bring race into this, it is irrelevant to you accusing me of being responsible for others.
As for your other deflection, neither of us were on those juries, were we?
Click to expand...

You vote for the cocksuckers who favor fewer restrictions on guns. That’s where you bear responsibility.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top