Why American life went on as normal during the killer pandemic of 1969

Hawkeye10 said:
No vaccine is likely and the "experts" still have almost no clue how this thing kills us, or what to do about it, or much of anything else for that matter....

FUCK ME
Click to expand...

It kills by interfering with respiration, if it kills at all. It is those with weak systems already that succumb to it. They are dying already. Quite a few deaths are marked as 'by Covid', when Covid is not involved at all. Several coroners have been falsifying records, a felony in some States, and they are getting sued for it. At this point, we don't know how many are infected, or how many 'died from' Covid, as opposed to something else. There are just too many instances that show these numbers are essentially random in nature (of type randU0.
 
Nordberg said:
Corona is much more transmissible and more virulent. Healthcare pros compare it to 1918 flu.
Click to expand...

The rice-a-rona is not any more transmissible than any other flu. Most people show mild symptoms at most. My cousin (a nurse) and her husband (both are reasonably healthy as far as I am aware) contracted the rice-a-rona. They are both doing just fine, as is the case with most all people at their age and respiratory health status.

There is no reason to fear monger over this virus.
 
gfm7175 said:
The rice-a-rona is not any more transmissible than any other flu. Most people show mild symptoms at most. My cousin (a nurse) and her husband (both are reasonably healthy as far as I am aware) contracted the rice-a-rona. They are both doing just fine, as is the case with most all people at their age and respiratory health status.

There is no reason to fear monger over this virus.
Click to expand...

There is reason to believe that cities like Stockholm and London are approaching herd immunity and the figure is around 20% not 60%. The US Centers for Disease Control hardly a hotbed of libertarian nut jobs, announced last week: the infection fatality rate of Covid-19 is nowhere near 3.4 per cent as first feared, but around 0.26 per cent. Seasonal flu’s IFR is 0.1 per cent, 0.2 per cent in an especially bad year. Thus Covid-19 is barely more lethal than a bad flu.
 
archives said:
Do I need to repeat the facts again?

Your numbers cover nearly two years, COVID has done in 100,000 in three months. Today we have considerable numbers dying from the seasonal flu when a five minute stop at the corner drug store will give on the protection, so there are always going to be numbers of avoidable deaths

All these virus aren’t the same but COVID is new, novel, no existing immunities, no preventative measures
Click to expand...

Not three months, the first case was detected in December of last year. It's also not that new as it is an RNA virus very similar to SARS. They were developing a vaccine for that back in 2003 but it petered out, Farr's Law in play, and there weren't enough people to test it on. The same seems to be happening with this virus as well.
 
Into the Night said:
Flu is not a bacterium. It's a virus.
You are ignoring the numbers.
Click to expand...

I, nor any of the facts I posted in the rebuttal you are commenting on, said anything about a bacterium anywhere

And the numbers in the initial post encompasses a year and half, the COVID numbers are for three and half months, but thanks for stopping bye
 
Grajonca said:
Not three months, the first case was detected in December of last year. It's also not that new as it is an RNA virus very similar to SARS. They were developing a vaccine for that back in 2003 but it petered out, Farr's Law in play, and there weren't enough people to test it on. The same seems to be happening with this virus as well.
Click to expand...

January 19th (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191), four months and twelve days if you want to get picky, hundred thousand plus deaths in four months and eleven days, and the numbers you are presenting as equals covers nearly a year and half
 
archives said:
I, nor any of the facts I posted in the rebuttal you are commenting on, said anything about a bacterium anywhere
Click to expand...
Lie. Denying what you posted doesn't wash with me.
archives said:
And the numbers in the initial post encompasses a year and half, the COVID numbers are for three and half months, but thanks for stopping bye
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. Total numbers are just not high enough to call it an epidemic, much less a pandemic. All of this is news media and Democratic party hype.

OMB.
 
archives said:
I, nor any of the facts I posted in the rebuttal you are commenting on, said anything about a bacterium anywhere

And the numbers in the initial post encompasses a year and half, the COVID numbers are for three and half months, but thanks for stopping bye
Click to expand...

Bullshit, the virus was first detected last December and was almost certainly in the US before that! You can never stop lying, can you! As I also said before 50% of the victims were under 50, not miserable old sods like you!
 
Last edited:
Grajonca said:
Bullshit, the virus was first detected last December and was almost certainly in the US before that! You can never lying, can you! As I also said before 50% of the victims were under 50, not miserable old sods like you!
Click to expand...

Actually I was wrong the first case was detected way back in November in Wuhan.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top