Trump's Business Acumen
- Thread starter Oneuli
- Start date
Lol, she’s hardly I’ll informed or uneducated, come on Sailor, you don’t need to insult her to make your points.
Seems to be your little pet phrase, cunt. Sad that it's the best you have.
Go ahead and continue to run away from the other posters trying to get a straight answer out of you, punk. It's amusing to watch such an ignorant coward.
I haven't danced at all. That's what has caused all this whimpering from you. You tried to name the tune, and then melted down when I refused to dance to it. Instead, I've stood here solidly and told you that I'll answer your question once you've answered mine. Lacking the courage to do so, you've now tried to distract from the question by personal insults. But, as you see, that too has failed. I'm still standing right here, still telling you that if you'd like to move forward, you'll need to answer the question. Good luck!
MSNBC Parrot says:
meet with Russian agents to try to get valuable information against Clinton SQUAWK!
meet with Russian agents to try to get valuable information against Clinton SQUAWK!
meet with Russian agents to try to get valuable information against Clinton SQUAWK!
meet with Russian agents to try to get valuable information against Clinton SQUAWK!
lol
Laughable diversion. Better than shitty business acumen, isn’t it?
How many millions is Obama worth? How much of that is from Daddy?
Pull your head out of your ass, waterboy, and pay attention. Maybe you’ll learn something. Doubtful, but not impossible.
It is proven that several of the people associated with him have met with Russians to get information on Clinton. Mueller at this point is just connecting the dots. No indictments have come because of the midterm elections. I look for things to heat up after November 7.
That could very well be. When the facts come out then it will be confirmed or not. That is my point. Until then, it all just conjecture.
You are dancing right now, and Chiquita, you have no rhythm.
No. Just an accurate description of you. How about the joke about sliding down the stairs? Why so quiet?
jesus. do you ever just stop? relentlessness doesn't win debates. I think I've made the terms clear.
I suppose that depends on how you measure it -- for example, speed of improvement, duration of improvement, total amount of improvement, etc., and which aspects of improvement you're measuring -- poverty rates, real income levels, real GDP, etc. But I'd argue it isn't even close to the worst recovery in our history.
For example, compare to the first Reagan recovery -- the recovery he inherited from Jimmy Carter, from the recession of January-July 1980. How good was that recovery? Well, considering it was over just a year after it had begun, and the nation was back in recession, I'd say not good at all. And during that twelve months, we hadn't come close to getting back to where we'd been before the last recession.
Comparing that Reagan recovery to the Obama recovery, Obama's was far longer (the third-longest in American history). And Obama's got us to a place where almost most economic indicators were better than they had been before the start of the prior recession (e.g., real incomes were higher, real GDP per capita was higher, stock values were vastly higher, etc.)
No, obviously that's untrue. That would be Abraham Lincoln, who was so divisive that his election resulted in an outright Civil War. Notably, Obama and Lincoln had in common the fact that the "divisiveness" took the form of angry white southern racist rural conservatives freaking out about the election of someone they saw as threatening white supremacy. This nation tends to suffer division any time that faction isn't getting its way.
That's certainly not the case any more. Trump never served a day in any political office at any level before becoming president. Obama was considerably more experienced than that, having served in public office both at the state level and in the Senate, before that, and having been a Constitutional scholar and a political activist for years before that. How that experience stacks up to others, I guess, is open to argument. For example, we've had a few president who had zero civilian political experience, and were instead elected because they'd gotten famous in the military. Zachary Taylor, US Grant, and Eisenhower all lacked any civilian political experience. I'd argue Grant and Eisenhower had some experience with pseudo-political functions in administering conquered territory in the wake of their respective wars. Taylor, though, was clearly a lot less experienced, overall, than Obama. He'd been a general during a dirty little war on Mexico, and that was the sum and total of his qualifications for high office.
No, I'm not aware of that. But, if I am, what does it say about you that this fucking idiot demolishes you in every single exchange we have?
Your knowledge of history is hilariously bad. In 1928, the year before Hoover became president, US GDP was $97.4 billion. By 1932, his last year in office, it was $59.5 billion. Do you still think Obama's track record on GDP was the worst? Keep in mind, real GDP hit an all-time high on his watch.
Actually, on Obama's watch the poverty rate fell, and median real incomes rose for individuals, families, and households. In fact, one of his years had the most rapid rise in median real household income on record in American history.
Actually, the deficit fell on his watch. Check for yourself, if you don't believe me. Here's a story about the deficit from shortly before Obama took office:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...trillion-in-fiscal-2009-idUSN0643708720090107
That's $1.2 trillion. What do you think the federal deficit was when Obama left office? Be specific, please.
Have a cracker MSNBC Parrot. You're too stupid to even comprehend the lunacy in your claim that Trump has no business acumen. Why argue with stupid parrot?
There's the Truth Detector method, yet again: ask a bunch of questions SQUAWK!
here's the Truth Detector method, yet again: ask a bunch of questions SQUAWK!
here's the Truth Detector method, yet again: ask a bunch of questions SQUAWK!
here's the Truth Detector method, yet again: ask a bunch of questions SQUAWK!
Nope, I'm still not responding to your attempt to name the tune. I'm still telling you that if you want to move forward, you'll need to find the courage to answer my questions first. And you're still cowering.