NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and

Phantasmal said:
[h=3]Description[/h]Natural News is a conspiracy theory and fake news website. The website sells various dietary supplements, promotes alternative medicine, tendentious nutrition and health claims, fake news, and espouses various conspiracy theories. Wikipedia
Click to expand...

For the past two decades I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature, to support their claims and assertions.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.
 
Cypress said:
For the past two decades I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organization with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature.

In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.
Click to expand...

No one takes your bullshit seriously when you start every post with a lie, fabrication or strawman shit-for-brains. :rolleyes:
 
Wolverine said:
Centerleftfl said:


Wikipedia? look we know it's true, the left saw a chance to grab more money from the American people and went headlong into it.
Now something I do know, you leftists continue to spew your hatred, and name call, I am done playing your game. If we met face to face I would shove those words down your throat, not because i am a violent person, but because what you and your socialist friends are trying to do is ruin this country for a Globalist Agenda. I doubt you understand that you are simply lemmings, and sheep, doing their bidding, but that is fact.
Click to expand...


You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!
Click to expand...
 
Centerleftfl said:
You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!
Click to expand...

What I love is watching shrill, dishonest lying leftists like you coming out every day and remove any doubt about it. ;)
 
moon said:
I do enjoy watching you struggle for comment.
Click to expand...

I wish I could say I enjoy watching your inane stupidity and pathological lying; but pathetic, redundant, petty and stupid are the only adjectives that come to mind.

You're a low IQ, terrorist loving buffoon who prefers echo chambers. Run along asshat. ;)
 
Cypress said:
For the past two decades
Click to expand...
I don't believe you.

Cypress said:
I have asked Climate Deniers why they are incapable of pointing to prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature, to support their claims and assertions.
Click to expand...
"prestigious, internationally-recognized scientific organizations with expertise in climate science and a substantial body of peer reviewed scientific literature" is NOT science. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. The relevant theories of science are the authoritative source with regard to this discussion.

Cypress said:
In two decades I have not received a credible answer to that question.
Click to expand...
Yes, you have. You have again just now.

I have pointed you to Logic, which tells us that words cannot be circularly defined, that definitions must make reference to something outside of themselves. Define "climate change". Describe precisely how a climate "changes"?

I have also pointed you to science, which tells us that the AGW model is not possible. See the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Stefan Boltzmann Law. You can't slow or trap heat, you can't increase entropy in an isolated system, you can't make heat flow backwards, you can't decrease radiance of Earth while increasing temperature of Earth.

I have also pointed you to mathematics, which tells us that we don't have the means to accurately measure the temperature of the Earth. Temperatures can easily vary by 20degF per mile, and since that variance is so high, we would need upwards of 200 million thermometers to even begin such an analysis of Earth's temperature. We don't have our thermometers uniformly spaced, we don't have the same observer simultaneously reading them all, and we don't even make use of RAW data, all of which are math errors.

"Climate Change" religious dogma is simply that... religious dogma. It rejects logic, it rejects science, it rejects mathematics...
 
Centerleftfl said:
You gotta love it. Remember when being 'in the closet' for Republicans was about HOMOSEXUALITY? Now its because THEY KNOW there is climate change but 'can't come out'!
Click to expand...

Define "climate change".

Remember, circular definitions are meaningless...
 
fgm7.15
giphy.gif

Define "climate change".
Click to expand...
 
Wolverine said:
Centerleftfl said:


Wikipedia? look we know it's true, the left saw a chance to grab more money from the American people and went headlong into it.
Now something I do know, you leftists continue to spew your hatred, and name call, I am done playing your game. If we met face to face I would shove those words down your throat, not because i am a violent person, but because what you and your socialist friends are trying to do is ruin this country for a Globalist Agenda. I doubt you understand that you are simply lemmings, and sheep, doing their bidding, but that is fact.
Click to expand...


poor christer kook
Click to expand...
 
Centerleftfl said:


https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-08...e-change-not-caused-by-suvs-fossil-fuels.html

How many fucking times do we have to POST THIS, asshole? We've responded numerous times when your ilk tries to PEDDLE your and it's bullshit. Especially from this site.


Natural News - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Natural_News


Natural News (formerly NewsTarget, which is now a separate sister site) is a conspiracy theory and fake news website. The website sells various dietary supplements, promotes alternative medicine, tendentious nutrition and health claims, fake news, and espouses various conspiracy theories.‎Founder · ‎Criticism and controversies · ‎Notable claims


​




All False statements involving NaturalNews.com | PolitiFact ...

https://www.politifact.com › naturalnewscom › statements › byruling › false



The measles vaccine has killed 108 people in the last decade, while no one has died of measles. — PolitiFact Georgia on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015. Page 1 of ...


​
Click to expand...
OK, Now show me an actual study that concludes the sun has nothing to do with GW and GW is completely attributed to SUV's and farting cows. Just one.
 
gfm7175 said:
Define "climate change".

Remember, circular definitions are meaningless...
Click to expand...

Notice how MOST REPUBLICANs use the term "Climate change". In science climate change and GLOBAL WARMING have scientific differences but are essentially the same (it's an 'over time' thing). They are both used by CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.

But a REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE decided several years back that REPUBLICANS should use CLIMATE CHANGE. 'It wasn't as SCARY and didn't evoke emotional reactions'. (If it doesn't 'sound scary' then you don't really have to hurry to do anything about it, right?) Apparently the REPS on this board got the memo!

If you don't know who FRANK LUNTZ is, find another board...

The second premise is also wrong, as demonstrated by perhaps the only individual to actually advocate changing the term from 'global warming' to 'climate change', Republican political strategist Frank Luntz in a controversial memo advising conservative politicians on communicating about the environment:

It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.“Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.​


 
Last edited:
archives said:
It is always the same, Flat Earthers come up with some "study" from some recognized climate denier site and attempt to create a false paradigm, as if it immediately cancels out the preponderance of scientific evidence in the other direction
Click to expand...

^ Attack the messenger; big surprise there.

"Flat Earth". You obvious didn't read anything of the article.
 
Centerleftfl said:
Notice how MOST REPUBLICANs use the term "Climate change".
Click to expand...
There's no specific way that "republicans" use the term "climate change". The term is meaningless. It has not been defined outside of itself.

Centerleftfl said:
In science
Click to expand...
Neither are science. They are religion.

Centerleftfl said:
climate change and GLOBAL WARMING
Click to expand...
Undefined buzzwords. Define "climate change". Define "global warming".

Centerleftfl said:
have scientific differences
Click to expand...
Undefined terms do not have "differences". They are simply undefined.

Centerleftfl said:
but are essentially the same (it's an 'over time' thing).
Click to expand...
See above.

Centerleftfl said:
They are both used by CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.
Click to expand...
Climate "scientists" are anything BUT... They reject science.

Centerleftfl said:
But a REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE decided several years back that REPUBLICANS should use CLIMATE CHANGE. 'It wasn't as SCARY and didn't evoke emotional reactions'. (If it doesn't 'sound scary' then you don't really have to hurry to do anything about it, right?) Apparently the REPS on this board got the memo!
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter which term is used; they are both meaningless buzzwords.

Centerleftfl said:
If you don't know who FRANK LUNTZ is, find another board...
Click to expand...
Don't know or care who he is.

Centerleftfl said:
The second premise is also wrong, as demonstrated by perhaps the only individual to actually advocate changing the term from 'global warming' to 'climate change'[/B], Republican political strategist Frank Luntz in a controversial memo advising conservative politicians on communicating about the environment:[/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE]

It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.“Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.​
Click to expand...
I don't care what term is used... They are both meaningless buzzwords. Basing argumentation on them yields void arguments, a logical fallacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top