Now that I've subscribed to WaPo I get better news than ever, Duke.
Can't afford the NYT, though, can you, Duchess? I can - subsidized, naturally.
Now that I've subscribed to WaPo I get better news than ever, Duke.
How would I know, Christiecrite?![]()
Can't afford the NYT, though, can you, Duchess? I can - subsidized, naturally.![]()
Sure I can afford it. In fact I'm thinking of getting it soon... unsubsidized, Duke.
Thanks... there's really an app called crapcleaner?![]()
It's called CCleaner these days!
Keep thinking, Duchess. At your age, you need to pinch those pennies.![]()
Sure thing, old timer. Except I'm not the one being subsidized.
Fun fact: If I was your age, I would be forced to retire.![]()

You're already retired. That's why you can spend so much time posting.
Who told you that, Duchess?![]()
You're not following the script, Leggiecrite. Your next comment was to demand I post a time and date stamped photo.
So, nobody told you that I'm your age.
![]()
BTW, I have all the photos I need.
The party who's being taped must be informed, but as in the case of Linda Tripp, immunity can be given. The only thing is that the tape could never be used as evidence in a trial, but it could be used as evidence in an investigation and possibly as reason for impeachment.
Not sure exactly how that would work, given that public knowledge of it and the resulting public opinion, would play a major role in the decision to impeach.
We've already heard from a professor of his or two that he was a poor to mediocre student.
Kinda what I said, but maybe not clear. One party in the conversation needs to be in the know.
"Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a "one-party consent" law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation."