Cohens tapes start emerging

You're not following the script, Leggiecrite. Your next comment was to demand I post a time and date stamped photo.

So, nobody told you that I'm your age. :D

tumblr_lqb46lIaKJ1qb5gkjo1_400.gif

BTW, I have all the photos I need.
 
The party who's being taped must be informed, but as in the case of Linda Tripp, immunity can be given. The only thing is that the tape could never be used as evidence in a trial, but it could be used as evidence in an investigation and possibly as reason for impeachment.

Not sure exactly how that would work, given that public knowledge of it and the resulting public opinion, would play a major role in the decision to impeach.

Kinda what I said, but maybe not clear. One party in the conversation needs to be in the know.

"Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a "one-party consent" law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation."
 
Kinda what I said, but maybe not clear. One party in the conversation needs to be in the know.

"Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a "one-party consent" law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation."

Depending on which state you're in, you could run afoul of state law, though.

There are twelve states which require two-party consent.

Here in Florida, the law requires consent of both parties. In New York where Cohen likely recorded Trump, the consent of only one party is required.
 
Back
Top