gfm7175
Jesus is LORD!
Self defense is NOT murder, dude.He got away with murder.
Self defense is NOT murder, dude.He got away with murder.
It wasn't advisable for anybody to be at the riot. Personally I tend to avoid trouble.Why? Is it more advisable to allow your business to be burned to the ground? I don't get this illogical argument.
Of course they didn't. Don't get me wrong. I think Kyle is a good kid that wanted to help out. It sure caused him a lot of anxiety no doubt with the trial and all.It's almost as stupid as claiming that Kyle had no business being there, but the rioters and looters did?
What comment? He used his weapon very well. Outdrew Grosskreutz in fact.As for your previous comment, it is OBVIOUS that Kyle did know how to use the weapon he brought to Kenosha. Did you know he is a wannabe police cadet?
know. I think he's basically a good kid.Rittenhouse was 17 at the time, living with his family in nearby Antioch, Illinois, and had taken part in police cadet training programs, pronouncing himself a supporter of the pro-police “Blue Lives Matter” movement.
Illiterate much? Can't read the articles? Gotcha.
Your statement is untrue, the Washington post did not give him $250,000.
I'm thinking it was about 10-2 and the 10 weren't going to back down an inch. Everybody wanted to get back to their families. We didn't have that hanging over althea, Dutch et al.we should read the deliberation notes to see how that shit was done..........because we've tried everything else
the two cases are very much different and you know this. your wishes of 'justice' will never be seen fruitful. OJ didn't make any self defense claims, nor was he found not guilty by reason of self defense........
Your articles do not show anything MSM said that was a lie about Rittenhouse.
ok, mixed up facts. he filed suit for 250 million, they settled for undisclosed amount. why would they settle unless they were in the wrong?
Why would that be relevant in civil court?
They just as well could have settled with the kid paying them, for attorneys fees, and filing a frivolous lawsuit.
What lies did msm say?

You sure hate people who study the Constitution don’t you!

you don't think the plaintiffs have to show that damages were caused by defendant alone?
I hate people who say they studied the Constitution and then prove they didn't, or don't understand it.

No I don’t think the plaintiff would have to show that. Florida, and I believe Wisconsin, our contributory negligence states.
why would they settle unless they were in the wrong?