Saint Kyle!

[Stringfellow Hawk]

Right. How odd that the only ppl who got dead during the Kenosha unrest were the ppl that the fat little murder kid killed. Very strange, isn't it?

that is what happens to fucktards that attack people prepared to defend themselves, free body bags to all idiots

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

that is what happens to fucktards that attack people prepared to defend themselves, free body bags to all idiots

It's good to know who the supporters of murder are, whether in real life or in the cyber sense. Congratulations.

Now throw out one of your specious little misogynist comments, and toddle off. Dis-missed.

 

[Stringfellow Hawk]

It's good to know who the supporters of murder are, whether in real life or in the cyber sense. Congratulations.

Now throw out one of your specious little misogynist comments, and toddle off. Dis-missed.

Yes run away as you clearly can't support your position and clearly don't understand the constitution and a person's right to defend themselves. the people he killed were convicted pedophiles and felons, he did us favor

 

[Legion]

 

[Stone]

It won't happen. The NYT let the Palin defamation lawsuit go to trial because they knew that the 1st Amendment was on their side. She lost. Fat little murder boy will lose as well.

Did you not read my post?

 

[Stone]

Right. How odd that the only ppl who got dead during the Kenosha unrest were the ppl that the fat little murder kid killed. Very strange, isn't it?

They were violent insurrectionists. I thought the left said that all violent insurrectionists were to be killed? Good to know the next time violent left wingers commit violent crimes at a peaceful but fiery protest. Words have meaning.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You are correct. The whole purpose of this is money making, but not through the court case. They are fleecing donors for as much money as possible, and giving a bit of it to Rittenhouse.

Agreed. It's also influence peddling. The people behind this are pushing a Trumpian agenda and using a dumbass kid to do it.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

that is what happens to fucktards that attack people prepared to defend themselves, free body bags to all idiots

Agreed. Ashli and all the assholes sitting in prison now for 1/6 should have known better if they weren't fucking QAnon loons.

 

[Lionfish]

dup

 

[Stringfellow Hawk]

Agreed. Ashli and all the assholes sitting in prison now for 1/6 should have known better if they weren't fucking QAnon loons.

wrong thread dumbass dementia ridden whiny ass baby

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The US legal system says otherwise. He was acquitted on all counts, and you are digging a deeper hole for yourself.

The problem with your argument is that the US legal system also says something about winning a defamation lawsuit. Kyle is the one that is digging deep hole here. One he can't win in court. One that will get tossed before it ever goes to trial. One that will likely require he pay attorney fees for whoever he sues since this is such an obvious case of first amendment rights.

In case you didn't realize it, Palin's lawsuit was tossed quickly in 2017. She had to appeal to get it reinstated and then she lost for the very reason the judge originally tossed it in 2017. She had no proof to support her lawsuit.


My suggestion for anyone that is sued by Rittenhouse simply claim a religious right to say that.
God says all killing is murder. Rittenhouse killed someone. Therefor God says Rittenhouse committed murder and I am only agreeing with God when I say that Rittenhouse committed "murder".

The problem is that "murder" is not a term restricted to just a legal term.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

their is absolutely a case, many media outlets have had to pay up for less evidence

ROFLMAO.

OK, please present your case. When you don't present a case, it will prove you and Rittenshouse have no case.
Your case must meet 3 standards to be valid.
1. You have to point to a specific statement made about Rittenhouse that is factually untrue and was presented as fact and not as opinion.
2. You have to show whoever made the statement knew the statement was false when they made that statement. Any correction by a media source is usually enough to show they didn't know it was false when the statement was first made.
3. You have to show actual harm to Rittenhouse of a monetary fashion. What business opportunities did he lose? The fact that he announced this on Fox News would show he clearly has media access after the statement.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

There seems to be no end to idiots willing to donate to immoral things like this.

True believers. They consider it as moral as Russian invading Ukraine.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

He is also included now as a defendant in one of the lawsuits filed by one of the people he killed. I expect that the plaintiffs here will have a far better chance of succeeding than the fat murder boy will if he sues media figures.

"Kyle Rittenhouse has been added as a defendant to a civil lawsuit filed by the parents of Anthony Huber, a Wisconsin man Rittenhouse fatally shot in Kenosha during street protests in August 2020."

Do you think Kyle's PAC will pay off the debt if he loses or just leave him swinging in the breeze? I'm thinking the latter since there is no honor in PACs that support murder, pedophiles and other criminals.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Sandman’s win isn’t what you think it is, but you run with that, anyway. It might pay for his first year in college. Hope he invested it.

So you don't know, but pretend to an authority anyway.

 

[MAGA MAN]

The problem with your argument is that the US legal system also says something about winning a defamation lawsuit. Kyle is the one that is digging deep hole here. One he can't win in court. One that will get tossed before it ever goes to trial. One that will likely require he pay attorney fees for whoever he sues since this is such an obvious case of first amendment rights.

In case you didn't realize it, Palin's lawsuit was tossed quickly in 2017. She had to appeal to get it reinstated and then she lost for the very reason the judge originally tossed it in 2017. She had no proof to support her lawsuit.


My suggestion for anyone that is sued by Rittenhouse simply claim a religious right to say that.
God says all killing is murder. Rittenhouse killed someone. Therefor God says Rittenhouse committed murder and I am only agreeing with God when I say that Rittenhouse committed "murder".

The problem is that "murder" is not a term restricted to just a legal term.

So your strategy for the defamers is to lie.

 

[MAGA MAN]

It appears that some on the left agree with you. Selectively, of course.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Just speaking a language you understand, Jimmy:

False equivalency. Insults returned vs. your basis. Nice try though...

 

[MAGA MAN]

Why do you believe that?

Palin was a public figure when the defamation happened.

 

[MAGA MAN]

You seem to be unable to distinguish the Sandman case from the Rittenhouse case. In the first one, the kid didn't do anything actionable other than stand there smirking. The video and photos made him look like he was doing something he was not -- harassing the old native guy. That's why the media settled their cases with him. Sandman was an unknown private citizen until the photos/video was taken.

Rittenhouse, on the other hand, went to Kenosha, got an illegal-for-him-to-have weapon, and shot three people, killing two of them. The fact that it was self-defense per the jury isn't important. Whoopi, Uygar, me, and everyone else has the right under the 1st Amendment to give their opinion on both what he did and the jury's verdict. Rittenhouse went there hoping to kill. He killed. He went on trial. He lost his anonymity because of his own actions, not the actions of the media or others. He now has a high bar to jump in order to prove defamation. He will not be able to do that.

No, Saint Kyle lost his anonymity after others tried to kill him, and then a pile of elites called him a murderer for defending himself.