cawacko
Well-known member
I think black kids are more at risk than kids of other races, yes. At risk of being shot and killed by police.
back to trolling I see
I think black kids are more at risk than kids of other races, yes. At risk of being shot and killed by police.
Bad analogies, Hillary charged that much because she got that much, when was the last time any Trump did anything for free. And Obama got the book advance because he is a past President, a rare commodity, with experiences Americans want to read, good move by the publishing company
None of that has absolutely nothing to do with Walmart
So do "non Trump voters" want government restriction on CEO pay? Isn't that part of what made corporations offer CEO's more stock options which has resulted in higher pay, legislation trying to limit it?
This sounds on one of my chief complaints with democrats to gnash teeth when it comes to Walmart. Sam Walton set out to employee people nobody else would even if they could only work limited hours. He didn't do it to get subsidies. He did it so mom's could put in a few hours while the kids were at school or dad's could do a few hours in the evening to make extra cash beyond their other job. I am a progressive and I absolutely admire the guy for that instinct. Now the government gives many of those workers benefits like EITC. The government subsidizes the workers, not the corporation, but democrats call it a giant subsidy to Walmart while simultaneously pooting a brick if you dare mention taking the EITC away.
Walton set out to make as much money as he possible could.
I think black kids are more at risk than kids of other races, yes. At risk of being shot and killed by police.
Walton set out to make as much money as he possible could.
No, just more likely to act like savages.
The numbers indicate that more whites get shot by police that blacks.
we want the workers ,who actually create the profits ,to get their fair share. Corporate profits are at all time highs, but workers wages have been stagnant for about 50 years. The workers created great wealth and the execs and stock holders took it.
What do you think businesses set out to do? Fail?
Sam Walton provided a service and was rewarded handsomely for it.
When Jeff Bezos created Amazon do you think his goal was to create a mediocre internet company or one of the best company's on the planet?
The money comes when you serve people and provide what they want.
Racist.
Gross numbers, sure.
But gross numbers don't tell the whole story.
So you have this nasty habit of lying by omission.
Nothing racist about calling someone that acts like a savage a savage.
Gross numbers are what matter.
Gross numbers are what matter.
Remember this statement. It's going to come back to haunt you later.
You're the savage here. An underachieving, middle aged, white loser whose life didn't turn out the way you were promised. So instead of getting angry at the people who lied to you, you get angry at people who are victims of those doing the exploiting. What a clueless dolt.
So then white people are welfare queens since the majority of people on welfare are white.
You are a welfare queen.
https://brandongaille.com/welfare-statistics-by-race-state-and-payment/
Last time I looked, 39.8% for blacks > 38.8% of whites.
Hey einstein. Everyone agrees people who START successful companies should be amply rewarded. But the CEOs who follow don't do much. They still deserve more than the peasants but not 1200 times as much. Maybe 10 times. THINK
Look at your populism/liberalism coming out!