Err, when there is no gasoline available
There was plenty of gas available, Colonial just didn't want anyone to get access to it.
Err, when there is no gasoline available
There was plenty of gas available, Colonial just didn't want anyone to get access to it.
If consumers cannot obtain a commodity upon demand, is there a shortage of that commodity?
No because someone could be holding all the access to the supply back, which is what Colonial did.
Yes.
What's the definition of "shortage"?
When there is no supply.
No, it's not.
Yesterday you tacitly accepted a different definition
Yes, it is.
No, it's not. Yesterday you tacitly accepted a different definition, and you know it.
No, YOU THOUGHT I tacitly accepted it, but I never did.
There was plenty of gas available, Colonial just didn't want anyone to get access to it.
No, it's not. Yesterday you tacitly accepted a different definition, and you know it.
Try again.
You are trying to pee into the wind. The man/woman/alphabet is an idiot.
You completely missed the point. When there is no supply, the reason is irrelevant, a shortage is created.
You completely missed the point. When there is no supply, the reason is irrelevant, a shortage is created.
He's claiming an unobtainable supply of a commodity doesn't comprise a shortage of that commodity.
I said it was artificial. But if you want to make a lowest common denominator, standards-so-low-they-are-lying-on-the-floor argument, I won't stop you from making an ass of yourself.